Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat: publish host-backed FreeCut editor surface - #5
Conversation
Starting initial review of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The host-backed package boundary and deterministic packaging approach are appropriate for this release. One release gate needs fixing before publish:
vite.editor-package.test.config.ts:8— The purported consumer smoke test imports the package by name, but a clean checkout does not install or link@quantfive/freecut-editor-surface: the root project has no workspace declaration forpackages/freecut-editor, and the test config supplies no alias for that package. The test consequently cannot verify a clean consumer install. The publish workflow also never invokes it, so a broken package entry/export can still be published. Please build and pack the artifact, install that tarball into a temporary consumer fixture, and run the smoke test from there as a required pre-publish step. That both makes the test runnable and validates the artifact consumers receive.
Review head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The consumer verification is now on the right boundary: the workflow builds the deterministic tarball, installs that artifact into an isolated temporary fixture, and runs the real smoke test before npm publish. This exercises package resolution and the published export path without relying on an undeclared workspace link or local alias.
The package boundary and release-gate shape remain appropriate for this release. No blocking issues found in the follow-up diff.
Reviewed `60ac3e54`...`fd487df2`. Diff collection and GitHub posting were handled by the automation.lightninglu10
commented
Aug 17, 2026
@codepress /judge-verification can you judge this verification? Local VerificationPR Head SHA: Verifier revision binding
Behavioral Contract Results
Diff Trigger Inventory
FreeCut has no Verification Contract Results
Artifact Metadata
Supplementary repository baseline findingsThese checks were run and recorded but are not introduced by the package diff: targeted formatting for the 9 package/consumer files passed; the repository-wide Overall: ✅ PASS — PENDING JUDGEVerification artifacts
|
👋 Hey @lightninglu10! Spawning a verification judge session to help with your request. View session |
Dispatched by judge-verification. This judgment is READY TO MERGE at the current head. If the PR is still a draft, transition it to ready for review now with the guarded readiness transaction: Verification Judgment — PR #5 (local)Verdict: ✅ READY TO MERGE PR Head SHA: Summary: The local report covers the material behavior introduced by the diff: a clean consumer can install the packed package and mount the host-backed editor, the published boundary exposes stable metadata and no forbidden app/bootstrap dependencies, deterministic packaging is reproducible, and publication is gated on the exact packed-artifact smoke test. The current head matches the verified head, and the code audit found no contradictory behavior or material coverage gap. Revision binding
Diff trigger inventory
FreeCut has no Per-item
Overall status check
What stood up
|
Starting new changes review of |
lightninglu10
commented
Aug 17, 2026
@codepress /judge-verification can you judge this verification? Local VerificationPR Head SHA: Verifier revision binding
Behavioral Contract Results
Diff Trigger Inventory
FreeCut has no Verification Contract Results
Artifact Metadata
Supplementary repository baseline findingsTargeted formatting for package/consumer files passed. Repository-wide Overall: ✅ PASS — PENDING JUDGEVerification artifacts
|
👋 Hey @lightninglu10! Spawning a verification judge session to help with your request. View session |
Dispatched by judge-verification. This judgment is READY TO MERGE at the current head. If the PR is still a draft, transition it to ready for review now with the guarded readiness transaction: Verification Judgment — PR #5 (local)Verdict: ✅ READY TO MERGE PR Head SHA: Summary: The report establishes safety for the current PR head. It exercises the exact packed artifact in a clean consumer, reaches the real host-backed editor surface, checks the bounded host contract, proves the package boundary and reproducibility, and gates publication on the installed-artifact smoke. The live head matches the verified head, and the diff audit found no contradictory behavior or material coverage gap. Revision binding
Diff trigger inventory
FreeCut has no Per-item
Overall status check
What stood up
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
@quantfive/freecut-editor-surfacebrowser/package entry for the mergedFreeCutEditorSurfaceand typed host contract.0.1.0tarball with CSS, declarations, and host-disabled worker/model outputs excluded from the consumer artifact.Verification
Refs quantfive/codepress#5319