Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

Description

@MateWW

Background

I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
I've everything working besides one thing.
When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

Findings

I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

Why is that?

Current flow

Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

  • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
  • startServerInNewWindow
  • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
  • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

Why is that a problem?

  1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

    • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
    • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
    • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
  2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
    It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
    However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

Question

  1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
    Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

  2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
    This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

  3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

Reproducible demo:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

      Description

      @MateWW

      Background

      I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
      I've everything working besides one thing.
      When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
      I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

      Findings

      I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

      Why is that?

      Current flow

      Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

      • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
      • startServerInNewWindow
      • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
      • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

      Why is that a problem?

      1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

        • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
        • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
        • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
      2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
        It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
        However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

      Question

      1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
        Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

      2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
        This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

      3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

      Reproducible demo:

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        questionFurther information is requested

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

          Description

          @MateWW

          Background

          I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
          I've everything working besides one thing.
          When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
          I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

          Findings

          I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

          Why is that?

          Current flow

          Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

          • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
          • startServerInNewWindow
          • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
          • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

          Why is that a problem?

          1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

            • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
            • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
            • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
          2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
            It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
            However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

          Question

          1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
            Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

          2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
            This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

          3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

          Reproducible demo:

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            questionFurther information is requested

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

              Description

              @MateWW

              Background

              I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
              I've everything working besides one thing.
              When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
              I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

              Findings

              I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

              Why is that?

              Current flow

              Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

              • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
              • startServerInNewWindow
              • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
              • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

              Why is that a problem?

              1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

                • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
                • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
                • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
              2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
                It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
                However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

              Question

              1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
                Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

              2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
                This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

              3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

              Reproducible demo:

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                questionFurther information is requested

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

                  Description

                  @MateWW

                  Background

                  I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
                  I've everything working besides one thing.
                  When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
                  I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

                  Findings

                  I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

                  Why is that?

                  Current flow

                  Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

                  • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
                  • startServerInNewWindow
                  • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
                  • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

                  Why is that a problem?

                  1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

                    • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
                    • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
                    • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
                  2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
                    It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
                    However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

                  Question

                  1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
                    Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

                  2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
                    This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

                  3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

                  Reproducible demo:

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    questionFurther information is requested

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

                      Description

                      @MateWW

                      Background

                      I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
                      I've everything working besides one thing.
                      When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
                      I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

                      Findings

                      I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

                      Why is that?

                      Current flow

                      Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

                      • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
                      • startServerInNewWindow
                      • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
                      • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

                      Why is that a problem?

                      1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

                        • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
                        • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
                        • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
                      2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
                        It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
                        However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

                      Question

                      1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
                        Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

                      2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
                        This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

                      3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

                      Reproducible demo:

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        questionFurther information is requested

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

                          Description

                          @MateWW

                          Background

                          I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
                          I've everything working besides one thing.
                          When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
                          I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

                          Findings

                          I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

                          Why is that?

                          Current flow

                          Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

                          • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
                          • startServerInNewWindow
                          • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
                          • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

                          Why is that a problem?

                          1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

                            • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
                            • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
                            • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
                          2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
                            It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
                            However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

                          Question

                          1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
                            Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

                          2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
                            This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

                          3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

                          Reproducible demo:

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            questionFurther information is requested

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Is running packager by calling react-native internal script still necessary for run-android? #1799

                              Description

                              @MateWW

                              Background

                              I'm actively working on preparing a react-native monorepo template with enabled hoisting.
                              I've everything working besides one thing.
                              When I'm running react-native run-android packager is starting from monorepo root(./) instead of app package ./apps/app
                              I can workaround it by running packager upfront but I would love to have that template working without such workarounds.

                              Findings

                              I've dived deeply into how I can work around it and figured out that there is no option to solve that without patching react-native.

                              Why is that?

                              Current flow

                              Currently running packager for run-android is working the following way:

                              • CLI is calling startServerInNewWindow
                              • startServerInNewWindow
                              • lauchPackager.sh is calling packager.sh
                              • packager.sh is calling react-native start from PROJECT_ROOT which is statically set to the path relative to node_modules/react-native

                              Why is that a problem?

                              1. Currently the simplest option to change PROJECT_ROOT from CLI perspective is to overwrite PROJECT_ROOT environment variable inside .packager.env

                                • In the currently released react-native 0.71 packager.sh is always overwriting PROJECT_ROOT path with a path relative to the script location.
                                • In future version(react-native master) there it accepts PROJECT_ROOT from outside.
                                • Sadly there is still this condition that will overwrite this path because in monorepo we have hoisting so the react-native package is located in monorepo root instead PROJECT_ROOT
                              2. Generally configuration of react-native start from CLI perspective is limited.
                                It seems that packager.shaccepts additional arguments (with "$@" at the end) that will be forwarded to react-native start.
                                However launchPackager.command is not forwarding it from CLI

                              Question

                              1. I'm curious what is the story behind this solution where CLI have to call react-native internal script that will call CLI.
                                Maybe there is someone who has some background on this one?

                              2. Is this script treated internally in react-native as something that should be used by the community?
                                This question is based on this comment inside packager.sh that sounds like it is something for internal react-native testing.

                              3. If this is something that should be used by the community then I'm wondering if there is a way to make it more configurable from a CLI perspective.

                              Reproducible demo:

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                questionFurther information is requested

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions