Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Unroll indirection in paths - #191
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vjeux
commented
Jul 25, 2016
Contributor
👍 |
gaearon
commented
Jul 25, 2016
ContributorAuthor
e2e passed locally so I’ll get this in. |
This was referenced Jul 26, 2016
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes path calculation explicit so it’s easier to maintain.
In the future we can put
paths.before-eject.jsandpaths.after-eject.jsinto separate files so we don’t need to ship dev-only or dep-only code.I haven’t actually tested this yet.