Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
RFCs and references - #71
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 21, 2022
Merged
nevansforce-pushed
the
rfcs-and-references
branch
from
November 22, 2022 14:50
94f047b to
edc9b93CompareSwitch to the official RFC citation format, as reported at each RFCs txt citation URL, e.g: https://www.rfc-editor.org/refs/ref9051.txt. Removed "EXT-" from any citations that were still using it, because that is how modern IMAP RFCs cite their references. Add links to relevant specifications for response data structs, without resorting to the full citation syntax. ---- This is closer to what the format had already been before I switched it up the last time (9cd562a). I believe the earlier format was simply copy/pasted from the references section of whichever RFC was being used at the time (e.g. 2060 or 3501). But the RFC citation format has changed since then, too. I'd previously changed it to be more "readable". But since then I've added links throughout the documentation of methods and data types, only occasionally needing a list of "see also" links. That approach works and satisfies my readability concerns. So our references list should just be a standard list of citations and it would be better to use the official citation format. To consider: should we move the references list to a REFERENCES.md file?
nevansforce-pushed
the
rfcs-and-references
branch
from
November 22, 2022 14:54
edc9b93 to
981ea30CompareCollaboratorAuthor
@shugo: the reference to You can see the rendered result here: https://nevans.github.io/net-imap/Net/IMAP.html#class-Net::IMAP-label-References |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For simple ag/ack/rg/grep during development, I've added even more RFCs to the rake file.
Additionally, I updated and reformatted the "References" section... again. See my comments on 981ea30.