Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086

Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
move-to-schemer
Open

Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
move-to-schemer

Conversation

@simi

@simisimi commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure

@simi
simi requested review from flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi

simi commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)

@simi

simi commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.

jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

@simi

simi commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.

@StantonMattStantonMatt mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Merged
StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

@jasnow
jasnow self-requested a review June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow

jasnow commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from

  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.

I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.

@jasnow

jasnow commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from

  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.

I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.

Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)

  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake
      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake
      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures

@jasnow

jasnow commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.

jasnow
jasnow reviewed Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes

@jasnowjasnow left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones
+1 more reviewer
@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify - #1086
Open
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Open
Move fully to schemer - off-board deprecated kwalify#1086
simi wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom 
move-to-schemer
Conversation
@simi
@simisimi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  • first commit -> I have ported 2 stricter checks to not lower the barrier
  • second commit -> removed kwalify infrastructure
@simi
simi
requested review from
flavorjones and jasnowMay 31, 2026 13:23
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow follow-up for #1067 (comment)
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
@jasnow 🫡 happy to migrate also to https://github.com/jasnow/rkwalify if that's the preferred way forward now.
jasnow

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@simi
simi
commented
May 31, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Yup, I'll offboard the update to separate PR.
@StantonMattStantonMatt
mentioned this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
 Merged

StantonMatt

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view
@jasnow
jasnow
self-requested a review
June 2, 2026 19:32
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 3, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 6, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
I recommend making "rake" run both (with and without the kwalify code) for a while so we see if there are any differences. The "rake" will go from
  • json and kwalify output to
  • json and kwalify and non-kwalify output.
I will monitor the differences and report back to the team.
Alternative solution (2 runs: one with and one without)
  • Uses an ENV[USEKWALIFY] variable to run kwalify-checks or not.
  • **Unclear why it runs 3 times, only need 2. **
  • Here is the results with move-to-schemer branch and changes in gist
    https://gist.github.com/jasnow/5b2fc2c126c1967a9a160f1e5404e25d
    • With USEKWALIFY="yes" rake

      • Finished in 1.63 seconds (files took 0.44612 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 27.06 seconds (files took 14.91 seconds to load)
      • 59034 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 26.12 seconds (files took 11.6 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
    • unset USEKWALIFY ; rake

      • Finished in 2.11 seconds (files took 0.52456 seconds to load)
      • 1280 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 24.72 seconds (files took 12.3 seconds to load)
      • 57754 examples, 0 failures
      • Finished in 20.44 seconds (files took 14.62 seconds to load)
      • 56474 examples, 0 failures
@jasnow
jasnow
commented
Jun 11, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Took your PR changes plus the above "Alternative Solution" changes and created PR#1115.
jasnow
jasnow
reviewed
Jun 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jasnowjasnow
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created PR#1115 to use your changes plus USEKWALIFY changes.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnowjasnowjasnow approved these changes
@flavorjonesflavorjonesAwaiting requested review from flavorjones

+1 more reviewer

@StantonMattStantonMattStantonMatt approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@simi@jasnow@StantonMatt