Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Standardize reference of "Attribute Macro" - #958
Conversation
The Attributes section uses "macro attributes" but links to a section calling them "attribute macros"
JohnTitor
commented
Jun 28, 2021
I'm thinking of this but I'd prefer "macro attributes" if the wording hasn't been standardized yet. Because we have a similar wording "procedural macro attributes" and if we call the earlier "attribute macros", the word order isn't consistent. @ehuss thoughts? |
petrochenkov
commented
Jun 28, 2021
I use both depending on context - "macro attributes and other attributes" or "attribute macros and other macros". |
JohnTitor
commented
Jun 28, 2021
Hmm, that makes sense, it seems to make it clearer what we talk about now. So the question now is that whether we should standardize it or not. We should do if it makes some confusion, but it doesn't seem to be a serious problem right now. |
traviscross
commented
Oct 22, 2024
We're going to close this in favor of: ...and due to the reason that @petrochenkov mentioned, which is that there are kind of two things here depending on context. |
The Attributes section uses "macro attributes" but links to a section calling them "attribute macros"