Skip to content

Rollup of 9 pull requests - #101183

Merged
bors merged 28 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Dylan-DPC:rollup-6kewixv
Aug 30, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests#101183
bors merged 28 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Dylan-DPC:rollup-6kewixv

Conversation

@Dylan-DPC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

WaffleLapkinand others added 28 commits June 5, 2022 14:28
These methods allow to cancel draining of unyielded elements.
and show some extra information when it happens in CTFE
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Running with --bless causes the push to succeed if there are fixable
formatting changes, but the changes don't make it into the push.
We should have the user rerun with --bless (or x.py fmt) and commit the
changes themselves (they might want to amend a particular commit, for
instance).
This class was added to support the function signature [src] lockup. That
lockup was changed in 34bd2b8 to use flexbox
instead, leaving these selectors unused.
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
…lnay
Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`
This PR adds `keep_rest` methods to `vec::Drain` and `vec::DrainFilter` under `drain_keep_rest` feature gate:
```rust
// mod alloc::vec
impl<T, A: Allocator> Drain<'_, T, A> {
pub fn keep_rest(self);
}
impl<T, F, A: Allocator> DrainFilter<'_, T, F, A>
where
F: FnMut(&mut T) -> bool,
{
pub fn keep_rest(self);
}
```
Both these methods cancel draining of elements that were not yet yielded from the iterators. While this needs more testing & documentation, I want at least start the discussion. This may be a potential way out of the "should `DrainFilter` exhaust itself on drop?" argument.
…i-obk
Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck
This is certainly _one_ way to fixrust-lang#100075. Not really confident it's the _best_ way to do it, though.
The root cause of this issue is that during MIR type-check, we end up trying to equate an opaque against the same opaque def-id but with different substs. Because of the way that we replace RPITs during (HIR) typeck with an inference variable, we don't end up emitting a type-checking error, so the delayed MIR bug causes an ICE.
See the `src/test/ui/impl-trait/issue-100075-2.rs` test below to make that clear -- in that example, we try to equate `{impl Sized} substs=[T]` and `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]`, which causes an ICE. This new logic will instead cause us to infer `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]` as the hidden type for `{impl Sized} substs=[T]`, which causes a proper error to be emitted later on when we check that an opaque isn't recursive.
I'm open to closing this in favor of something else. Ideally we'd fix this in typeck, but the thing we do to ensure backwards compatibility with weird RPIT cases makes that difficult. Also open to discussing this further.
…gestion, r=cjgillot
Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`
Fixesrust-lang#100936
…ckh726
Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`
Fixesrust-lang#101020
…oli-obk
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to rust-lang#99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixesrust-lang/miri#2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
Remove `register_attr` feature
Closesrust-lang#66080
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Don't --bless in pre-push hook
Running with --bless causes the push to succeed if there are fixable
formatting changes, but the changes don't make it into the push.
We should have the user rerun with --bless (or x.py fmt) and commit the
changes themselves (they might want to amend a particular commit, for
instance).
…display, r=jsha
rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`
This class was added to support the function signature [src] lockup. That lockup was changed in 34bd2b8 to use flexbox instead, leaving these selectors unused.
Continuation of rust-lang#101046
…KO8Ki
Add another MaybeUninit array test with const
This is another possible syntax and I just want to be absolutely sure it behaves correctly.
@rustbotrustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 30, 2022
@rustbotrustbot added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 30, 2022
@Dylan-DPC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors

bors commented Aug 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit ec95a92 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 30, 2022
@bors

bors commented Aug 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit ec95a92 with merge 0631ea5...

@bors

bors commented Aug 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 0631ea5 to master...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 30, 2022
@bors
bors merged commit 0631ea5 into rust-lang:masterAug 30, 2022
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 30, 2022
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@borsbors mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2022
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0631ea5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1rangecount2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2%[1.2%, 1.2%]1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
--0
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1rangecount2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.4%[2.4%, 2.4%]1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7%[2.0%, 3.5%]2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.6%[-5.7%, -1.6%]2
All ❌✅ (primary)2.4%[2.4%, 2.4%]1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1rangecount2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6%[2.6%, 2.6%]1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-8.0%[-8.0%, -8.0%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change23

  2. number of relevant changes23

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

11 participants

@Dylan-DPC@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@WaffleLapkin@compiler-errors@RalfJung@JohnTitor@tmandry@notriddle@SUPERCILEX