Skip to content

Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching - #104335

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Noratrieb:macrowo
Nov 16, 2022
Merged

Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching#104335
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Noratrieb:macrowo

Conversation

@Noratrieb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Eager parser recovery can break macros, so we don't do it at first. But when we already know that the macro failed, we can retry it with recovery enabled to still emit useful diagnostics.

Helps with #103534

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @nagisa

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 12, 2022
Comment threadsrc/test/ui/macros/recovery-forbidden.rs Outdated
@bors

bors commented Nov 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104437) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Noratrieb
Noratriebforce-pushed the macrowo branch 2 times, most recently from 59553db to 5f12b10CompareNovember 15, 2022 18:13
This prevents issues with eager parser recovery during macro matching.
@compiler-errors

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @compiler-errors@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Nov 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit b7b6722 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 15, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching
Eager parser recovery can break macros, so we don't do it at first. But when we already know that the macro failed, we can retry it with recovery enabled to still emit useful diagnostics.
Helps with rust-lang#103534
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
…iaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#103750 (Fix some misleading target feature aliases)
- rust-lang#104137 (Issue error when -C link-self-contained option is used on unsupported platforms)
- rust-lang#104317 (cleanup and dedupe CTFE and Miri error reporting)
- rust-lang#104335 (Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching)
- rust-lang#104394 (various cleanups to try to reduce the use of spans inside method resolution)
- rust-lang#104459 (rustdoc: remove unused JS IIFE from main.js)
- rust-lang#104462 (rustdoc: remove pointless CSS `.rightside { padding-right: 2px }`)
- rust-lang#104466 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `#crate-search-div { display: inline-block }`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit e033a38 into rust-lang:masterNov 16, 2022
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 16, 2022
@Noratrieb
Noratrieb deleted the macrowo branch November 16, 2022 21:11
JohnTitor pushed a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2022
Cleanup macro matching recovery
The retry has been implemented already in rust-lang#104335. Also removes a `HACK` comment that's not really needed anymore because the "don't recover during macro matching" isn't really a hack but correct behavior.
@Noratrieb
Noratrieb restored the macrowo branch December 3, 2022 19:44
@Noratrieb
Noratrieb deleted the macrowo branch December 23, 2022 21:04
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching
Eager parser recovery can break macros, so we don't do it at first. But when we already know that the macro failed, we can retry it with recovery enabled to still emit useful diagnostics.
Helps with rust-lang#103534
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…iaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#103750 (Fix some misleading target feature aliases)
- rust-lang#104137 (Issue error when -C link-self-contained option is used on unsupported platforms)
- rust-lang#104317 (cleanup and dedupe CTFE and Miri error reporting)
- rust-lang#104335 (Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching)
- rust-lang#104394 (various cleanups to try to reduce the use of spans inside method resolution)
- rust-lang#104459 (rustdoc: remove unused JS IIFE from main.js)
- rust-lang#104462 (rustdoc: remove pointless CSS `.rightside { padding-right: 2px }`)
- rust-lang#104466 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `#crate-search-div { display: inline-block }`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@Noratrieb@rustbot@bors@compiler-errors@nagisa