Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear - #109923

Merged
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Update error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clear#109923
bors merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
ElectrifyPro:visibility

Conversation

@ElectrifyPro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates the error message error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.

Resolves#109822.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2023
@ElectrifyProElectrifyPro changed the title VisibilityUpdate error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier to be more clearApr 4, 2023
@wesleywiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @ElectrifyPro, this looks great to me!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Apr 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4e5c120 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2023
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…iser
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolvesrust-lang#109822.
@JohnTitorJohnTitor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#109527 (Set up standard library path substitution in rust-gdb and gdbgui)
- rust-lang#109752 (Stall auto trait assembly in new solver for int/float vars)
- rust-lang#109860 (Add support for RISC-V relax target feature)
- rust-lang#109923 (Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear)
- rust-lang#110070 (The `wrapping_neg` example for unsigned types shouldn't use `i8`)
- rust-lang#110146 (fix(doc): do not parse inline when output is json for external crate)
- rust-lang#110147 (Add regression test for rust-lang#104916)
- rust-lang#110149 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 788de47 into rust-lang:masterApr 11, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustc incorrectly suggests a pub(crate) on an enum variant or trait item is "unnecessary", implying it is permitted

4 participants

@ElectrifyPro@rustbot@wesleywiser@bors