remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655 - #112141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix #111655#112141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
anna-singleton:issue-111655-fix

Conversation

@anna-singleton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

remove the text stating that ? uses Into::into and add text stating it uses From::from instead. This closes#111655.

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 31, 2023
@thomcc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Seems fine. In principal we might want to keep the option of changing to Into open, but I figure we could just adjust the docs then, since it would be a strict superset. This more accurately describes the status quo, so I don't see a reason not to document it.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Jun 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 2eeb769 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…=thomcc
remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655
remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closesrust-lang#111655.
@Dylan-DPCDylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
- rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
- rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
- rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
- rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
- rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
- rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fixrust-lang#111655)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 129c559 into rust-lang:masterJun 1, 2023
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std incorrectly states that ? uses Into on the underlying error type

4 participants

@anna-singleton@rustbot@thomcc@bors