Skip to content

Update dist-various linux-gnu target baselines - #114189

Closed
cuviper wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
cuviper:dist-various-glibc
Closed

Update dist-various linux-gnu target baselines#114189
cuviper wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
cuviper:dist-various-glibc

Conversation

@cuviper

@cuvipercuviper commented Jul 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

These Tier 2 non-host targets were affected by the update to
ubuntu:22.04 in #113931, but the platform support page was already out
of date after #81521 updated to ubuntu:20.04. They are now listed for
kernel 5.15 and glibc 2.35 as found in 22.04, and a new footnote
mentions that this only matters when using the dynamic libstd.so.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@cuviper
Update dist-various linux-gnu target baselines
5a46c78
These Tier 2 non-host targets were affected by the update to
`ubuntu:22.04` in rust-lang#113931, but the platform support page was already out
of date after rust-lang#81521 updated to `ubuntu:20.04`. They are now listed for
kernel 5.15 and glibc 2.35 as found in 22.04, and a new footnote
mentions that this only matters when using the dynamic `libstd.so`.
@rustbotrustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 28, 2023
@nikic

nikic commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, does the kernel of the host matter for libstd.so? Aren't kernel differences handled at runtime? I'd expect the kernel requirement to always be the lowest overall supported version (apart from target specific requirements, e.g. for newer arches).

@Mark-Simulacrum

Mark-Simulacrum commented Jul 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I'd also expect similar. Kernel 5.15 is comparatively very recent -- I'd be surprised if we actually relied on that version here.

@Mark-SimulacrumMark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 31, 2023
@bors

bors commented Oct 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #116372) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@oskgo

oskgo commented Aug 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cuviper Any updates on this? Thanks

@cuviper

cuviper commented Aug 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't have any update, but your ping has bubbled this back up my to-do list, so I'll try to revisit it soon.

@alex-semenyukalex-semenyuk added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 22, 2024
@JohnCSimon

JohnCSimon commented Feb 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cuviper

Ping from triage: I'm closing this due to inactivity, Please reopen when you are ready to continue with this.
Note: if you are going to continue please open the PR BEFORE you push to it, else you won't be able to reopen - this is a quirk of github.
Thanks for your contribution.

@rustbot label: +S-inactive

@rustbotrustbot added the S-inactive Status: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs. label Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@Mark-SimulacrumMark-Simulacrum

Labels

S-inactiveStatus: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs.S-waiting-on-authorStatus: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@cuviper@nikic@Mark-Simulacrum@bors@oskgo@JohnCSimon@alex-semenyuk@rustbot