Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Inline 2 functions that appear in dep-graph profiles. - #119960
Conversation
cjgillot
commented
Jan 14, 2024
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Inline 2 functions that appear in dep-graph profiles. r? `@ghost`
bors
commented
Jan 14, 2024
bors
commented
Jan 14, 2024
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-timer
commented
Jan 14, 2024
Finished benchmarking commit (7811646): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 668.597s -> 669.203s (0.09%) |
cjgillot
commented
Jan 14, 2024
r? compiler |
WaffleLapkin
commented
Jan 14, 2024
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Jan 14, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119561 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 5)) - rust-lang#119742 (ARMv6K HorizonOS - Fix backlog for UnixListener) - rust-lang#119960 (Inline 2 functions that appear in dep-graph profiles.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119960 - cjgillot:inline-dg, r=WaffleLapkin Inline 2 functions that appear in dep-graph profiles. Those functions are small enough not to deserve a dedicated symbol.
Those functions are small enough not to deserve a dedicated symbol.