Avoid invoking the intrinsic query for DefKinds other than Fn or AssocFn

[oli-obk]

fixes the perf regression from #120675 by only invoking (and thus inserting into the dep graph) the intrinsic query if the DefKind matches items that can actually be intrinsics

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit b0f71f1 with merge 07f7a74...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 07f7a74 (07f7a740efc4bd26ed2ab5b3a8b8be01dec4bc7e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (07f7a74): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.5%	[4.5%, 4.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	83
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.7%	[-2.2%, -0.2%]	25
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	83

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[1.1%, 3.9%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[2.2%, 4.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.4%	[-14.3%, -0.9%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.3%	[-11.3%, -1.6%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-14.3%, 3.9%]	10

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 644.326s -> 643.806s (-0.08%)
Artifact size: 174.98 MiB -> 175.06 MiB (0.04%)

[oli-obk]

r? @pnkfelix found a way to fix the regression 😆 sorry should've tried this on the original PR

[pnkfelix]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit b0f71f1 has been approved by pnkfelix

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b0f71f1 with merge 75c20de...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web)(plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

failures:
---- [ui] tests/ui/mir/alignment/misaligned_lhs.rs stdout ----
error: error pattern ' misaligned pointer dereference: address must be a multiple of 0x4 but is' not found!
command: RUST_TEST_THREADS="8" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/remote-test-client" "run" "0" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/mir/alignment/misaligned_lhs/a"
--- stdout -------------------------------
--- stdout -------------------------------
uploaded "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/mir/alignment/misaligned_lhs/a", waiting for result
--- stderr -------------------------------
thread 'main' panicked at src/tools/remote-test-client/src/main.rs:310:9:
client.read_exact(&mut header) failed with Connection reset by peer (os error 104)
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[oli-obk]

@bors retry client.read_exact(&mut header) failed with Connection reset by peer (os error 104)

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b0f71f1 with merge aac29d1...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web)(plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

 SDKROOT: /Applications/Xcode_14.3.1.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk
AR: ar
##[endgroup]
curl: (28) Operation too slow. Less than 100 bytes/sec transferred the last 5 seconds
Error: Failure while executing; `/usr/bin/env /usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Homebrew/shims/shared/curl --disable --cookie /dev/null --globoff --user-agent Homebrew/4.2.9\ \(Macintosh\;\ Intel\ Mac\ OS\ X\ 13.6.4\)\ curl/8.4.0 --header Accept-Language:\ en --fail --progress-bar --silent --remote-time --output /Users/runner/Library/Caches/Homebrew/api/formula.jws.json --location --disable --cookie /dev/null --globoff --show-error --user-agent Homebrew/4.2.9\ \(Macintosh\;\ Intel\ Mac\ OS\ X\ 13.6.4\)\ curl/8.4.0 --header Accept-Language:\ en --fail --progress-bar --silent --compressed --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 5 https://formulae.brew.sh/api/formula.jws.json` exited with 28. Here's the output:
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.
[command]/usr/local/bin/git version

[oli-obk]

@bors retry curl: (28) Operation too slow. Less than 100 bytes/sec transferred the last 5 seconds

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b0f71f1 with merge 4d4bb49...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: pnkfelix
Pushing 4d4bb49 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4d4bb49): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	74
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.7%	[-2.1%, -0.2%]	26
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	74

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.4%	[1.3%, 1.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.6%	[3.6%, 3.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.7%	[-13.8%, -0.9%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.6%	[-11.3%, -1.6%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.0%	[-13.8%, 1.5%]	7

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-3.3%, -2.5%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 649.157s -> 650.25s (0.17%)
Artifact size: 172.55 MiB -> 172.57 MiB (0.01%)