Skip to content

Set branch protection function attributes - #128141

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
nikic:aarch64-bti
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

Set branch protection function attributes#128141
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
nikic:aarch64-bti

Conversation

@nikic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since LLVM 19, it is necessary to set not only module flags, but also function attributes for branch protection on aarch64. See llvm/llvm-project@e15d67c for the relevant LLVM change.

Fixes#127829.

Since LLVM 19, it is necessary to set not only module flags, but
also function attributes for branch protection on aarch64. See
llvm/llvm-project@e15d67c
for the relevant LLVM change.
@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @Nadrieril

rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 24, 2024
@nikicnikic mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933
try-job: dist-x86_64-apple
try-job: dist-apple-various
try-job: x86_64-apple-1
try-job: x86_64-apple-2
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
try-job: aarch64-apple
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-i686-msvc
try-job: dist-aarch64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc-alt
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933
try-job: i686-mingw
try-job: x86_64-mingw
try-job: dist-i686-mingw
try-job: dist-x86_64-mingw
@Nadrieril

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

r? @rust-lang/wg-llvm

@rustbotrustbot assigned cuviper and unassigned NadrierilJul 25, 2024

@dianqkdianqk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems the flags on the module are no longer being used? Can we remove this code?

ifletSome(BranchProtection{ bti, pac_ret }) = sess.opts.unstable_opts.branch_protection{
if sess.target.arch == "aarch64"{
unsafe{
llvm::LLVMRustAddModuleFlagU32(
llmod,
llvm::LLVMModFlagBehavior::Min,
c"branch-target-enforcement".as_ptr().cast(),
bti.into(),
);
llvm::LLVMRustAddModuleFlagU32(
llmod,
llvm::LLVMModFlagBehavior::Min,
c"sign-return-address".as_ptr().cast(),
pac_ret.is_some().into(),
);
let pac_opts = pac_ret.unwrap_or(PacRet{leaf:false,key:PAuthKey::A});
llvm::LLVMRustAddModuleFlagU32(
llmod,
llvm::LLVMModFlagBehavior::Min,
c"sign-return-address-all".as_ptr().cast(),
pac_opts.leaf.into(),
);
llvm::LLVMRustAddModuleFlagU32(
llmod,
llvm::LLVMModFlagBehavior::Min,
c"sign-return-address-with-bkey".as_ptr().cast(),
u32::from(pac_opts.key == PAuthKey::B),
);
}
}else{
bug!(
"branch-protection used on non-AArch64 target; \
this should be checked in rustc_session."
);
}
}

if bti {
to_add.push(llvm::CreateAttrString(cx.llcx, "branch-target-enforcement"));
}
if let Some(PacRet { leaf, key }) = pac_ret {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use let pac_opts = pac_ret.unwrap_or(PacRet { leaf: false, key: PAuthKey::A });? See

let pac_opts = pac_ret.unwrap_or(PacRet{leaf:false,key:PAuthKey::A});
.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so. Note that, while that code makes it look like non-leaf a-key is the default, this is not actually the case, as sign-return-address is still set to false in the None case and the overall functionality is disabled. (I think the reason why it's always setting all module flags is to get correct module flag merging behavior during LTO, but not entirely sure on that.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nikic

nikic commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It seems the flags on the module are no longer being used? Can we remove this code?

No, the module flags are still needed to emit the ELF attributes (and when creating functions with default attrs).

@dianqk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems the flags on the module are no longer being used? Can we remove this code?

No, the module flags are still needed to emit the ELF attributes (and when creating functions with default attrs).

LGTM. :) Comparing with clang's code, this seems largely consistent. But, clang doesn't always add these attributes:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/a347bdb2b828272359e49a8ce9de9d6412950838/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp#L1195-L1202

(Very complex options, especially under LTO.)

@cuviper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM as well!

@bors r=DianQK,cuviper rollup

@bors

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit ea7625f has been approved by DianQK,cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 29, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
…iaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#127574 (elaborate unknowable goals)
- rust-lang#128141 (Set branch protection function attributes)
- rust-lang#128315 (Fix vita build of std and forbid unsafe in unsafe in the os/vita module)
- rust-lang#128339 ([rustdoc] Make the buttons remain when code example is clicked)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
…iaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#127574 (elaborate unknowable goals)
- rust-lang#128141 (Set branch protection function attributes)
- rust-lang#128315 (Fix vita build of std and forbid unsafe in unsafe in the os/vita module)
- rust-lang#128339 ([rustdoc] Make the buttons remain when code example is clicked)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 6b23cb5 into rust-lang:masterJul 30, 2024
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 30, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128141 - nikic:aarch64-bti, r=DianQK,cuviper
Set branch protection function attributes
Since LLVM 19, it is necessary to set not only module flags, but also function attributes for branch protection on aarch64. See llvm/llvm-project@e15d67c for the relevant LLVM change.
Fixesrust-lang#127829.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
The LLVM 19.1.0 final release is planned for Sep 3rd. The rustc 1.82 stable release will be on Oct 17th.
The unstable MC/DC coverage support is temporarily broken by this update. It will be restored by rust-lang#126733. The implementation changed substantially in LLVM 19, and there are no plans to support both the LLVM 18 and LLVM 19 implementation at the same time.
Compatibility note for wasm:
> WebAssembly target support for the `multivalue` target feature has changed when upgrading to LLVM 19. Support for generating functions with multiple returns no longer works and `-Ctarget-feature=+multivalue` has a different meaning than it did in LLVM 18 and prior. The WebAssembly target features `multivalue` and `reference-types` are now both enabled by default, but generated code is not affected by default. These features being enabled are encoded in the `target_features` custom section and may affect downstream tooling such as `wasm-opt` consuming the module, but the actual generated WebAssembly will continue to not use either `multivalue` or `reference-types` by default. There is no longer any supported means to generate a module that has a function with multiple returns.
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933Fixesrust-lang#121444.
Fixesrust-lang#128212.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
The LLVM 19.1.0 final release is planned for Sep 3rd. The rustc 1.82 stable release will be on Oct 17th.
The unstable MC/DC coverage support is temporarily broken by this update. It will be restored by rust-lang#126733. The implementation changed substantially in LLVM 19, and there are no plans to support both the LLVM 18 and LLVM 19 implementation at the same time.
Compatibility note for wasm:
> WebAssembly target support for the `multivalue` target feature has changed when upgrading to LLVM 19. Support for generating functions with multiple returns no longer works and `-Ctarget-feature=+multivalue` has a different meaning than it did in LLVM 18 and prior. The WebAssembly target features `multivalue` and `reference-types` are now both enabled by default, but generated code is not affected by default. These features being enabled are encoded in the `target_features` custom section and may affect downstream tooling such as `wasm-opt` consuming the module, but the actual generated WebAssembly will continue to not use either `multivalue` or `reference-types` by default. There is no longer any supported means to generate a module that has a function with multiple returns.
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933Fixesrust-lang#121444.
Fixesrust-lang#128212.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
The LLVM 19.1.0 final release is planned for Sep 3rd. The rustc 1.82 stable release will be on Oct 17th.
The unstable MC/DC coverage support is temporarily broken by this update. It will be restored by rust-lang#126733. The implementation changed substantially in LLVM 19, and there are no plans to support both the LLVM 18 and LLVM 19 implementation at the same time.
Compatibility note for wasm:
> WebAssembly target support for the `multivalue` target feature has changed when upgrading to LLVM 19. Support for generating functions with multiple returns no longer works and `-Ctarget-feature=+multivalue` has a different meaning than it did in LLVM 18 and prior. The WebAssembly target features `multivalue` and `reference-types` are now both enabled by default, but generated code is not affected by default. These features being enabled are encoded in the `target_features` custom section and may affect downstream tooling such as `wasm-opt` consuming the module, but the actual generated WebAssembly will continue to not use either `multivalue` or `reference-types` by default. There is no longer any supported means to generate a module that has a function with multiple returns.
Related changes:
* rust-lang#127605
* rust-lang#127613
* rust-lang#127654
* rust-lang#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933Fixesrust-lang#121444.
Fixesrust-lang#128212.
github-actionsBot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
The LLVM 19.1.0 final release is planned for Sep 3rd. The rustc 1.82 stable release will be on Oct 17th.
The unstable MC/DC coverage support is temporarily broken by this update. It will be restored by rust-lang/rust#126733. The implementation changed substantially in LLVM 19, and there are no plans to support both the LLVM 18 and LLVM 19 implementation at the same time.
Compatibility note for wasm:
> WebAssembly target support for the `multivalue` target feature has changed when upgrading to LLVM 19. Support for generating functions with multiple returns no longer works and `-Ctarget-feature=+multivalue` has a different meaning than it did in LLVM 18 and prior. The WebAssembly target features `multivalue` and `reference-types` are now both enabled by default, but generated code is not affected by default. These features being enabled are encoded in the `target_features` custom section and may affect downstream tooling such as `wasm-opt` consuming the module, but the actual generated WebAssembly will continue to not use either `multivalue` or `reference-types` by default. There is no longer any supported means to generate a module that has a function with multiple returns.
Related changes:
* rust-lang/rust#127605
* rust-lang/rust#127613
* rust-lang/rust#127654
* rust-lang/rust#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933Fixesrust-lang/rust#121444.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#128212.
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
Update to LLVM 19
The LLVM 19.1.0 final release is planned for Sep 3rd. The rustc 1.82 stable release will be on Oct 17th.
The unstable MC/DC coverage support is temporarily broken by this update. It will be restored by rust-lang/rust#126733. The implementation changed substantially in LLVM 19, and there are no plans to support both the LLVM 18 and LLVM 19 implementation at the same time.
Compatibility note for wasm:
> WebAssembly target support for the `multivalue` target feature has changed when upgrading to LLVM 19. Support for generating functions with multiple returns no longer works and `-Ctarget-feature=+multivalue` has a different meaning than it did in LLVM 18 and prior. The WebAssembly target features `multivalue` and `reference-types` are now both enabled by default, but generated code is not affected by default. These features being enabled are encoded in the `target_features` custom section and may affect downstream tooling such as `wasm-opt` consuming the module, but the actual generated WebAssembly will continue to not use either `multivalue` or `reference-types` by default. There is no longer any supported means to generate a module that has a function with multiple returns.
Related changes:
* rust-lang/rust#127605
* rust-lang/rust#127613
* rust-lang/rust#127654
* rust-lang/rust#128141
* llvm/llvm-project#98933Fixesrust-lang/rust#121444.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#128212.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

aarch64-pointer-auth test failing on LLVM 19

6 participants

@nikic@rustbot@Nadrieril@dianqk@cuviper@bors