Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 6 pull requests - #128672
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…eports and remove the feature gate that silenced the lint
This allows the standard library to be compiled even with `download-rustc` enabled. Which means it's no longer a requirement to compile `rustc` in order to compile `std`. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
…d" assertion ICE See <rust-lang#128622>.
PR rust-lang#128581 introduced an assertion that all builtin attributes are actually checked via `CheckAttrVisitor` and aren't accidentally usable on completely unrelated HIR nodes. Unfortunately, the check had correctness problems. The match on attribute path segments looked like ```rust,ignore [sym::should_panic] => /* check is implemented */ match BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTE_MAP.get(name) { // checked below Some(BuiltinAttribute { type_: AttributeType::CrateLevel, .. }) => {} Some(_) => { if !name.as_str().starts_with("rustc_") { span_bug!( attr.span, "builtin attribute {name:?} not handled by `CheckAttrVisitor`" ) } } None => (), } ``` However, it failed to account for edge cases such as an attribute whose: 1. path segments *starts* with a builtin attribute such as `should_panic` 2. which does not start with `rustc_`, and 3. is also an `AttributeType::Normal` attribute upon registration with the builtin attribute map These conditions when all satisfied cause the span bug to be issued for e.g. `#[should_panic::skip]` because the `[sym::should_panic]` arm is not matched (since it's `[sym::should_panic, sym::skip]`). See <rust-lang#128622>.
…t, r=compiler-errors turn `invalid_type_param_default` into a `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps` `````@rust-lang/types````` I assume the plan is still to disallow this? It has been a future-compat lint for a long time, seems ripe to go for hard error. However, turns out that outright removing it right now would lead to [tons of crater regressions](rust-lang#127655 (comment)), so for now this PR just makes this future-compat lint show up in cargo's reports, so people are warned when they use a dependency that is affected by this. Fixesrust-lang#27336 by removing the feature gate (so there's no way to silence the lint even on nightly) CC rust-lang#36887
…ct_with_derive, r=nnethercote built-in derive: remove BYTE_SLICE_IN_PACKED_STRUCT_WITH_DERIVE hack and lint Fixesrust-lang#107457 by turning the lint into a hard error. The lint has been shown in future breakage reports since Rust 1.69 (released in April 2023). Let's see (via crater) if enough time has passed since rust-lang#104429, and unicode-org/icu4x#2834 has propagated far enough to let us make this a hard error. Cc ``@nnethercote`` ``@Manishearth``
…k-Simulacrum force compiling std from source if modified This allows the standard library to be compiled even with `download-rustc` enabled. Which means it's no longer a requirement to compile `rustc` in order to compile `std`. Ref. rust-lang#127322 (comment). Blocker for rust-lang#122709.
Implement cursors for `BTreeSet` Tracking issue: rust-lang#107540 This is a straightforward wrapping of the map API, except that map's `CursorMut` does not make sense, because there is no value to mutate. Hence, map's `CursorMutKey` is wrapped here as just `CursorMut`, since it's unambiguous for sets and we don't normally speak of "keys". On the other hand, I can see some potential for confusion with `CursorMut` meaning different things in each module. I'm happy to take suggestions to improve that. r? ````@Amanieu````
…lacrum Add test for updating enum discriminant through pointer Closesrust-lang#122600
…cote Do not fire unhandled attribute assertion on multi-segment `AttributeType::Normal` attributes with builtin attribute as first segment ### The Problem In rust-lang#128581 I introduced an assertion to check that all builtin attributes are actually checked via `CheckAttrVisitor` and aren't accidentally usable on completely unrelated HIR nodes. Unfortunately, the assertion had correctness problems as revealed in rust-lang#128622. The match on attribute path segments looked like ```rs,ignore // Normal handler [sym::should_panic] => /* check is implemented */ // Fallback handler [name, ..] => match BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTE_MAP.get(name) { // checked below Some(BuiltinAttribute { type_: AttributeType::CrateLevel, .. }) => {} Some(_) => { if !name.as_str().starts_with("rustc_") { span_bug!( attr.span, "builtin attribute {name:?} not handled by `CheckAttrVisitor`" ) } } None => (), } ``` However, it failed to account for edge cases such as an attribute whose: 1. path segments *starts* with a segment matching the name of a builtin attribute such as `should_panic`, and 2. the first segment's symbol does not start with `rustc_`, and 3. the matched builtin attribute is also of `AttributeType::Normal` attribute type upon registration with the builtin attribute map. These conditions when all satisfied cause the span bug to be issued for e.g. `#[should_panic::skip]` because the `[sym::should_panic]` arm is not matched (since it's `[sym::should_panic, sym::skip]`). ### Proposed Solution This PR tries to remedy that by adjusting all normal/specific handlers to not match exactly on a single segment, but instead match a prefix segment. i.e. ```rs,ignore // Normal handler, notice the `, ..` rest pattern [sym::should_panic, ..] => /* check is implemented */ // Fallback handler [name, ..] => match BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTE_MAP.get(name) { // checked below Some(BuiltinAttribute { type_: AttributeType::CrateLevel, .. }) => {} Some(_) => { if !name.as_str().starts_with("rustc_") { span_bug!( attr.span, "builtin attribute {name:?} not handled by `CheckAttrVisitor`" ) } } None => (), } ``` ### Review Remarks This PR contains 2 commits: 1. The first commit adds a regression test. This will ICE without the `CheckAttrVisitor` changes. 2. The second commit adjusts `CheckAttrVisitor` assertion logic. Once this commit is applied, the test should no longer ICE and produce the expected bless stderr. Fixesrust-lang#128622. r? ``@nnethercote`` (since you reviewed rust-lang#128581)
matthiaskrgr
commented
Aug 5, 2024
MemberAuthor
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Collaborator
bors
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Collaborator
bors
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Collaborator
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Collaborator
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 176e545209 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Aug 5, 2024
rust-timer
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Collaborator
Finished benchmarking commit (29e9248): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -3.1%, secondary 0.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 759.324s -> 759.685s (0.05%) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
invalid_type_param_defaultinto aFutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps#127655 (turninvalid_type_param_defaultinto aFutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps)BTreeSet#128309 (Implement cursors forBTreeSet)AttributeType::Normalattributes with builtin attribute as first segment #128623 (Do not fire unhandled attribute assertion on multi-segmentAttributeType::Normalattributes with builtin attribute as first segment)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup