Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 8 pull requests - #129443
Conversation
…s-gnu` targets `rust-lld.exe` built for `x86_64-pc-windows-gnu` depends on `libgcc_s_seh-1.dll` and `libwinpthread-1.dll` from MinGW-w64. Until now, they were not shipped alongside `rust-lld.exe`, and you could not run `rust-lld.exe` on most systems. This problem didn't surface until now because: * Most targets don't use `rust-lld` by default. * Some people had these DLLs in their `PATH` from some other MinGW binary. * `rustup` used to add `bin` to the `PATH`, which contains these DLLs for `rustc.exe`. But it no longer does that: rust-lang/rustup@ce3c09aFixesrust-lang#125809
Signed-off-by: Amjad Alsharafi <26300843+Amjad50@users.noreply.github.com>
fixesrust-lang#127576 windows implementation still needs some work
…=Amanieu fix: fs::remove_dir_all: treat internal ENOENT as success fixesrust-lang#127576 try-job: test-various
…lls, r=Kobzol,petrochenkov,jieyouxu Ship MinGW-w64 runtime DLLs along with `rust-lld.exe` for `-pc-windows-gnu` targets `rust-lld.exe` built for `x86_64-pc-windows-gnu` depends on `libgcc_s_seh-1.dll` and `libwinpthread-1.dll` from MinGW-w64. Until now, they were not shipped alongside `rust-lld.exe`, and you could not run `rust-lld.exe` on most systems. This problem didn't surface until now because: * Most targets don't use `rust-lld` by default. * Some people had these DLLs in their `PATH` from some other MinGW binary. * `rustup` used to add `bin` to the `PATH`, which contains these DLLs for `rustc.exe`. But it no longer does that: rust-lang/rustup@ce3c09aFixesrust-lang#125809 try-job: dist-x86_64-mingw
…r=jieyouxu Migrate `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvi` `run-make` test to rmake Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html). The final Makefile! Every Makefile test is now claimed. This is difficult to test due to the uncommon architecture it is specific to. I don't think it is in the CI (I didn't find it in `jobs.yml`, but if there is a way to test it, please do. Locally, on Linux, it compiles and panics at the `llvm_filecheck` part (if I replace the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` with `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, of course), which is expected. For this reason, the Makefile and associated script have been kept, but with a leading underscore.
…piler-errors Use a LocalDefId in ResolvedArg.
…r=tgross35 Update `compiler_builtins` to `0.1.120` Includes rust-lang/compiler-builtins#672 which fixes regression issue with Apple and Windows compilers. try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-apple-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc
…es, r=notriddle Fix extern crates not being hidden with `doc(hidden)` Fixesrust-lang#126796. Only the current crate should never be stripped, any other crate should be strippable. r? ``@notriddle``
Don't trigger refinement lint if predicates reference errors Fixesrust-lang#129404
…-rustdoc, r=jieyouxu Fix a missing import in a doc in run-make-support
matthiaskrgr
commented
Aug 23, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
bors
commented
Aug 23, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127623 (fix: fs::remove_dir_all: treat internal ENOENT as success) - rust-lang#128876 (Ship MinGW-w64 runtime DLLs along with `rust-lld.exe` for `-pc-windows-gnu` targets) - rust-lang#129055 (Migrate `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvi` `run-make` test to rmake) - rust-lang#129386 (Use a LocalDefId in ResolvedArg.) - rust-lang#129400 (Update `compiler_builtins` to `0.1.120`) - rust-lang#129414 (Fix extern crates not being hidden with `doc(hidden)`) - rust-lang#129417 (Don't trigger refinement lint if predicates reference errors) - rust-lang#129433 (Fix a missing import in a doc in run-make-support) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
commented
Aug 23, 2024
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Aug 23, 2024
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
bors
commented
Aug 23, 2024
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
matthiaskrgr
commented
Aug 23, 2024
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Aug 23, 2024
bors
commented
Aug 23, 2024
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Aug 23, 2024
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: b5723af345 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
rust-timer
commented
Aug 23, 2024
Finished benchmarking commit (c8b14ba): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -1.3%, secondary 3.3%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.4%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 749.494s -> 751.695s (0.29%) |
Successful merges:
rust-lld.exefor-pc-windows-gnutargets #128876 (Ship MinGW-w64 runtime DLLs along withrust-lld.exefor-pc-windows-gnutargets)x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvirun-maketest to rmake #129055 (Migratex86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvirun-maketest to rmake)compiler_builtinsto0.1.120#129400 (Updatecompiler_builtinsto0.1.120)doc(hidden)#129414 (Fix extern crates not being hidden withdoc(hidden))r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup