Rollup of 3 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Use Enabled{Lang,Lib}Feature instead of n-tuples #132114 (Use Enabled{Lang,Lib}Feature instead of n-tuples)
• Update Fuchsia CI script for package serving #132163 (Update Fuchsia CI script for package serving)
• Effects cleanup #132168 (Effects cleanup)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

[bors]

📌 Commit 56463df has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 56463df with merge 80d0d92...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 80d0d92 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#132114	Use Enabled{Lang,Lib}Feature instead of n-tuples	7cad740232c1e867266ab23d4dc3567171c2844e (link)
#132163	Update Fuchsia CI script for package serving	9e1623c780cc2eb6aeed36a8020f5ecb3451d913 (link)
#132168	Effects cleanup	68dfeba9119353271962448991f64cbe874ea1b3 (link)

previous master: ae4c6b6640

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (80d0d92): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	16
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.8%, secondary 1.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[1.7%, 5.3%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-0.8%, -0.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-0.8%, -0.8%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.9%	[-4.7%, -3.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	105
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.5%, -0.0%]	33
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	105

Bootstrap: 785.03s -> 782.08s (-0.38%)
Artifact size: 333.74 MiB -> 333.70 MiB (-0.01%)