Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove generic //@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten} in tests - #136476
Merged
Conversation
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Remove redundant `//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten}` in tests
Follow-up to rust-lang#135926.
When `//@ needs-{unwind,subprocess}` are the suitable capability guards.
Resolvesrust-lang#135923.
r? `@ghost`
try-job: test-variousjieyouxu
commented
Feb 3, 2025
MemberAuthor
Er, actually, I should've just deleted them and see what fails first |
//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten} in tests//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten} in testsjieyouxu
commented
Feb 3, 2025
MemberAuthor
@bors try |
bors
commented
Feb 3, 2025
Collaborator
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Remove generic `//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten}` in tests
Follow-up to rust-lang#135926.
In favor of capability-based guards `//@ needs-{unwind,subprocess}`.
Resolvesrust-lang#135923.
r? `@ghost`
try-job: test-variousbors
commented
Feb 3, 2025
Collaborator
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
jieyouxu
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 3, 2025 14:26
jieyouxuforce-pushed
the
panic-panic-panic
branch
from
February 3, 2025 14:27
cd4c655 to
190a8a6Comparejieyouxu
commented
Feb 3, 2025
MemberAuthor
Try-job is green, so @rustbot ready r? compiler |
lcnr
commented
Feb 3, 2025
Contributor
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Feb 3, 2025
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Remove generic `//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten}` in tests
Follow-up to rust-lang#135926.
In favor of capability-based guards `//@ needs-{unwind,subprocess}`.
Resolvesrust-lang#135923.
r? `@ghost`
try-job: test-various
This was referenced Feb 3, 2025
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136289 (OnceCell & OnceLock docs: Using (un)initialized consistently) - rust-lang#136299 (Ignore NLL boring locals in polonius diagnostics) - rust-lang#136411 (Omit argument names from function pointers that do not have argument names) - rust-lang#136430 (Use the type-level constant value `ty::Value` where needed) - rust-lang#136476 (Remove generic `//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten}` in tests) - rust-lang#136484 (Notes on types/traits used for in-memory query caching) - rust-lang#136493 (platform-support: document CPU baseline for x86-32 targets) - rust-lang#136498 (Update books) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136476 - jieyouxu:panic-panic-panic, r=lcnr Remove generic `//@ ignore-{wasm,wasm32,emscripten}` in tests Follow-up to rust-lang#135926. In favor of capability-based guards `//@ needs-{unwind,subprocess}`. Resolvesrust-lang#135923. r? ``@ghost`` try-job: test-various
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #135926.
In favor of capability-based guards
//@ needs-{unwind,subprocess}.Resolves#135923.
r? @ghost
try-job: test-various