Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove tidy checks for tests/ui/issues/ - #144173
Conversation
rustbot
commented
Jul 19, 2025
|
rustbot
commented
Jul 19, 2025
There are changes to the cc @jieyouxu
|
issues.txt
jieyouxu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't leave commented out code, just delete it.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Once that work is complete, we won't need this check (there were way too many tests under |
da05401 to
3720916CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jieyouxu
commented
Jul 19, 2025
spellcheck is broken for other reasons, u can ignore. |
Kivooeo
commented
Jul 19, 2025
Should be fine now, only reason I need tidy to ignore deleted I will remove all moved tests from |
bors
commented
Jul 20, 2025
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #144181) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
jieyouxu
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Can you rebless @rustbot author |
rustbot
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
Kivooeo
commented
Jul 21, 2025
With keeping removing this checks? |
jieyouxu
commented
Jul 21, 2025
My understanding of the intention is that:
|
Kivooeo
commented
Jul 21, 2025
@rustbot ready deleted all lines that starts with reverted this filter on rust/src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs Line 78 in bcaa795 but kept this, because otherwise it's threw errors about existed tests rust/src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs Lines 133 to 134 in bcaa795 |
issues.txttests/ui/issues/tests/ui/issues/tests/ui/issues/Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `@jieyouxu` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``@jieyouxu`` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ```@jieyouxu``` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144272 (resolve: Make disambiguators for underscore bindings module-local (take 2)) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ````@jieyouxu```` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `````@jieyouxu````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``````@jieyouxu`````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ```````@jieyouxu``````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ````````@jieyouxu```````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `````````@jieyouxu````````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup merge of #144173 - Kivooeo:tidy_checks, r=jieyouxu Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``````````@jieyouxu`````````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
r? @jieyouxu
As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.
This change was discussed here #t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬