Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed - #144240
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intoJul 24, 2025
Conversation
rustbot
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Collaborator
r? @fee1-dead rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead. Use |
xizheyin
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2025
xizheyin
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the additions. It would be nice if the name of the commit contained the name of the modified testcase, e.g. Add a case for ui test false-sealed-traits-note.rs, as this commit would appear in the master branch, which would be obvious at a glance.
yuk1tyforce-pushed
the
false-sealed-traits-note-reported-in-another-issue
branch
from
July 21, 2025 06:54
14e968d to
ec2084aCompare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
fee1-dead
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Member
Please fix the failure at https://triage.rust-lang.org/gha-logs/rust-lang/rust/46405993368#2025-07-21T17:27:23.9058573Z |
fee1-dead
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Member
@rustbot author |
rustbot
commented
Jul 21, 2025
Collaborator
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
yuk1tyforce-pushed
the
false-sealed-traits-note-reported-in-another-issue
branch
from
July 22, 2025 14:31
ec2084a to
0aa6170Compareyuk1ty
commented
Jul 23, 2025
ContributorAuthor
@rustbot ready |
fee1-dead
commented
Jul 23, 2025
Member
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Jul 23, 2025
Collaborator
GuillaumeGomez added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
…ported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closesrust-lang#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (rust-lang#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
fmease added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
…ported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closesrust-lang#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (rust-lang#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
fmease added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
…ported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closesrust-lang#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (rust-lang#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
fmease added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
…ported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closesrust-lang#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (rust-lang#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links) - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
…ported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closesrust-lang#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (rust-lang#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144232 (Implement support for `become` and explicit tail call codegen for the LLVM backend) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rust-timer added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup merge of #144240 - yuk1ty:false-sealed-traits-note-reported-in-another-issue, r=fee1-dead Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed Closes#143121 I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case. I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻
Kobzol pushed a commit
to Kobzol/rustc_codegen_gcc
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - rust-lang/rust#143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - rust-lang/rust#144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - rust-lang/rust#144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - rust-lang/rust#144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - rust-lang/rust#144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - rust-lang/rust#144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - rust-lang/rust#144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - rust-lang/rust#144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - rust-lang/rust#144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - rust-lang/rust#144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - rust-lang/rust#144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - rust-lang/rust#144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - rust-lang/rust#144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - rust-lang/rust#144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes#143121
I started to fix the issue but I found that this one has already been addressed in this PR (#143431). I added an additional test to prove the reported thing has been resolved just in case.
I think we can discard this pull request if there's no need to add such kind of tests👍🏻