Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 8 pull requests - #148388
Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 20 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This "cleanup" function is more than a decade old, and I can't find any evidence of modern-day bootstrap being able to pass any of these flags to `--host-rustcflags` or `--target-rustcflags`.
There are probably plenty of tests that will check this incidentally, but it's convenient to have a dedicated self-test.
In particular, this eliminates the cryptic `of: &TestPaths` parameters.
This method no longer returns a `TestPaths`, so the old name is no longer appropriate.
…r=joboet Implement `strip_circumfix` lib feature Tracking issue: rust-lang#147946
split definition and use site hidden tys Tracking this implicitly is kinda messy and easy to get wrong. r? `@BoxyUwU`
compiletest: Remove `cleanup_debug_info_options` This "cleanup" function is more than a decade old, and I can't find any evidence of modern-day bootstrap being able to pass any of these flags to `--host-rustcflags` or `--target-rustcflags`. I thought about replacing the cleanup with an assertion, but I think it's better to delete it entirely for now, and re-add checks later if they're motivated by actual problems in practice. In addition to deleting some old and confusing code, this also lets us remove three instances of duplicating `TestCx`, which is the biggest win. r? jieyouxu
compiletest: Don't modify `testpaths` when creating aux contexts Modifying `TestCx::testpaths` makes it vastly harder to reason about how compiletest is using test paths, and can be avoided without much trouble by simply passing explicit source-file paths into a small number of auxiliary-aware methods. --- This PR was originally based on a much larger change that split `TestPaths` into multiple structs and multiple `TestCx` fields (as seen in early revisions of rust-lang#148160), but after further cleanups it turned out that very few tweaks were actually needed to avoid changes to `testpaths`. r? jieyouxu
…ercote
Do not emit solver errors that contain error types
any follow-up errors are going to either be duplicates or often disappear if the error itself is fixed.
in this PR it mostly silences dyn-compat errors as all the other errors are already deduplicated outside of the test suite. The dyn compat errors are independent errors and I think if the dyn compatiblity depended on an error type it would not actually show, so this is PR is actually silencing independent errors, too.
I am opening this PR because I am seeing lots of `{type error}: const Trait` errors when adding more const checking. So instead of targetting just those specific errors, I wanted to try out fully avoiding such errors near the trait solver.
cc ```@rust-lang/types``` for thoughtstemporary-lifetime-extension.rs test works in all editions
…r=Noratrieb docs: makes a note about possible building `rustc 1.91.0 + host tools` for win7 I have make notes in docs that there is possible to build host tools for target `x86_64-win7-windows-msvc`. <img width="668" height="331" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0335bc72-963c-4bfd-9910-61963dbf7dd7" /> r? `````@roblabla````` `````@rustbot````` label A-docs O-windows-7 P.S. prebuilt binaries can be found [here](https://github.com/Fenex/rust-win7/releases).
…ouxu Use --print host-tuple to get the host `--print host-tuple` has been available since 1.84 so there's no longer a need to parse the output of `-vV`. Especially since this script is shipped with the toolchain.
matthiaskrgr
commented
Nov 2, 2025
MemberAuthor
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
commented
Nov 2, 2025
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
commented
Nov 2, 2025
MemberAuthor
let add the miri bump actually |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
strip_circumfixlib feature #147947 (Implementstrip_circumfixlib feature)cleanup_debug_info_options#148194 (compiletest: Removecleanup_debug_info_options)testpathswhen creating aux contexts #148199 (compiletest: Don't modifytestpathswhen creating aux contexts)rustc 1.91.0 + host toolsfor win7 #148362 (docs: makes a note about possible buildingrustc 1.91.0 + host toolsfor win7)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup