Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Rollup of 2 pull requests by jhpratt · Pull Request #150476 · rust-lang/rust · GitHub
Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #150476

Merged
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Rollup of 2 pull requests#150476
bors merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
jhpratt:rollup-sgjxdxk

Conversation

@jhpratt

@jhprattjhpratt commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lasiotusand others added 5 commits December 19, 2025 15:48
The unwinding feature is called `panic-unwind` and not `panic_unwind`.
Adjust the feature gate to look for these values.
Additionally, the `abort_internal()` call is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This function was incorrectly called run_main_thread_not_inlined when
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
…-Simulacrum
std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0
…pratt
xous: fix build due to function and feature name changes
This tracks a rename of `panic_unwind` to `panic-unwind`, as well as the removal of `abort_internal` as a function.
This also fixes an incorrect function name from when `rust_main_thread_not_inlined` was added.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 29, 2025
@jhpratt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 3fc0f58 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2025
@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 3fc0f58 with merge a1bb910...

@bors

bors commented Dec 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing a1bb910 to main...

@borsbors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 29, 2025
@bors
bors merged commit a1bb910 into rust-lang:mainDec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 29, 2025
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#MessagePerf Build Sha
#150178std: Motor OS: switch to moto-rt v0.16.0d4f33352cd85369525814ad6ca3ef45bcb3c5153 (link)
#150363xous: fix build due to function and feature name changesbdeb3ecea96a150488cd1b306c10ecfb717094c2 (link)

previous master: 112a274275

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 112a274 (parent) -> a1bb910 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard a1bb9103b0b8da0f0eefd3d6b76b01391fe9e86d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. aarch64-apple: 8993.2s -> 10605.8s (+17.9%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 3331.7s -> 3804.2s (+14.2%)
  3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2510.7s -> 2756.0s (+9.8%)
  4. aarch64-msvc-2: 5925.0s -> 6355.4s (+7.3%)
  5. aarch64-msvc-1: 7084.9s -> 6578.0s (-7.2%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-3: 6276.3s -> 6717.8s (+7.0%)
  7. i686-gnu-1: 7514.5s -> 6986.7s (-7.0%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 9084.4s -> 8541.6s (-6.0%)
  9. dist-ohos-x86_64: 4343.6s -> 4101.9s (-5.6%)
  10. tidy: 165.4s -> 174.2s (+5.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@jhpratt
jhpratt deleted the rollup-sgjxdxk branch December 29, 2025 12:13
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1bb910): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7%[-0.7%, -0.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7%[-2.7%, -2.7%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.523s -> 482.459s (-0.63%)
Artifact size: 390.82 MiB -> 390.85 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-borsThis PR was explicitly merged by bors.rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@jhpratt@bors@rust-timer@rustbot@lasiotus@xobs