Skip to content

rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path - #157602

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
fmease:rustdoc-rm-unnecessary-fast-path
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path#157602
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
fmease:rustdoc-rm-unnecessary-fast-path

Conversation

@fmease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I added this "fast path" prematurely in PR #116882.
It's not actually necessary as this perf run shows: #146483 (comment) (https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=40ace17fc3891155bad26a50d60a9ab07b83bf8e&end=a77816d56c8fdadab64ae3f9fe1a653bfdb975a8&stat=instructions:u).

Let's remove it since makes it slightly more annoying to add new reprs (one would need to update two places).

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Jun 8, 2026
@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @camelid

rustbot has assigned @camelid.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: rustdoc
  • rustdoc expanded to 9 candidates
  • Random selection from GuillaumeGomez, camelid, lolbinarycat, notriddle

@mu001999

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors

rust-borsBot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 09c0629 has been approved by mu001999

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-borsrust-borsBot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 8, 2026
@mu001999mu001999 assigned mu001999 and unassigned camelidJun 8, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2026
…-path, r=mu001999
rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path
I added this "fast path" prematurely in PR rust-lang#116882.
It's not actually necessary as this perf run shows: rust-lang#146483 (comment) (https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=40ace17fc3891155bad26a50d60a9ab07b83bf8e&end=a77816d56c8fdadab64ae3f9fe1a653bfdb975a8&stat=instructions:u).
Let's remove it since makes it slightly more annoying to add new reprs (one would need to update two places).
This was referenced Jun 8, 2026
rust-borsBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2026
…uwer
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #147302 (asm! support for the Xtensa architecture)
- #148820 (Add very basic "comptime" fn implementation)
- #157299 (Fix unstable diagnostics in tests)
- #143511 (Improve TLS codegen by marking the panic/init path as cold)
- #154608 (Add `_value` API for number literals in proc-macro)
- #156762 (xfs support in `test_rename_directory_to_non_empty_directory`)
- #157300 (Relax test requirements for consistency)
- #157383 (tests: codegen-llvm: Ignore BPF targets in c-variadic-opt)
- #157413 (fix: don't suggest .into_iter() for .cloned()/.copied() on non-reference Option)
- #157578 (Fix diagnostics for non-exhaustive destructuring assignments (#157553))
- #157587 (explain that the size_of constant also serves to avoid optimizing away 'unused' size_of calls)
- #157596 (test: remove ineffective link-extern-crate-with-drop-type test)
- #157602 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path)
@rust-bors
rust-borsBot merged commit eb90e0a into rust-lang:mainJun 8, 2026
12 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2026
Rollup merge of #157602 - fmease:rustdoc-rm-unnecessary-fast-path, r=mu001999
rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path
I added this "fast path" prematurely in PR #116882.
It's not actually necessary as this perf run shows: #146483 (comment) (https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=40ace17fc3891155bad26a50d60a9ab07b83bf8e&end=a77816d56c8fdadab64ae3f9fe1a653bfdb975a8&stat=instructions:u).
Let's remove it since makes it slightly more annoying to add new reprs (one would need to update two places).
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.98.0 milestone Jun 8, 2026
@fmease
fmease deleted the rustdoc-rm-unnecessary-fast-path branch June 8, 2026 20:01
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2026
…uwer
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#147302 (asm! support for the Xtensa architecture)
- rust-lang/rust#148820 (Add very basic "comptime" fn implementation)
- rust-lang/rust#157299 (Fix unstable diagnostics in tests)
- rust-lang/rust#143511 (Improve TLS codegen by marking the panic/init path as cold)
- rust-lang/rust#154608 (Add `_value` API for number literals in proc-macro)
- rust-lang/rust#156762 (xfs support in `test_rename_directory_to_non_empty_directory`)
- rust-lang/rust#157300 (Relax test requirements for consistency)
- rust-lang/rust#157383 (tests: codegen-llvm: Ignore BPF targets in c-variadic-opt)
- rust-lang/rust#157413 (fix: don't suggest .into_iter() for .cloned()/.copied() on non-reference Option)
- rust-lang/rust#157578 (Fix diagnostics for non-exhaustive destructuring assignments (rust-lang/rust#157553))
- rust-lang/rust#157587 (explain that the size_of constant also serves to avoid optimizing away 'unused' size_of calls)
- rust-lang/rust#157596 (test: remove ineffective link-extern-crate-with-drop-type test)
- rust-lang/rust#157602 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary fast path)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-rustdoc-frontendRelevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@fmease@rustbot@mu001999@camelid