Skip to content

interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed - #160399

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:interpret-deref-validity
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed#160399
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:interpret-deref-validity

Conversation

@RalfJung

@RalfJungRalfJung commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

View all comments

Trying to claw back the perf regression from #160012.

We could also, like, skip the entire check in const-eval when we don't care about validity. But the slowdown will also affect Miri so I want to first try what we can do without doing less UB checking.

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 2, 2026
@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors try
@rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbotrustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 2, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-borsBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2026
interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

rust-borsBot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: fd82567 (fd825675c9cb0054bc1537dbd227fc750bc2fbaa)
Base parent: 28c66af (28c66af27578a28bc8cad1c5957be4b1e2e7fb8b)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fd82567): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never rustc-perf
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3%[0.2%, 0.3%]2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-9.2%[-10.2%, -8.6%]6
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.8%, secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8%[-2.8%, -2.8%]1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4%[-0.4%, -0.4%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)-2.8%[-2.8%, -2.8%]1

Cycles

Results (primary -0.2%, secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6%[0.6%, 0.6%]4
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.9%[0.4%, 1.4%]5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.8%[-1.0%, -0.5%]5
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.5%[-3.4%, -0.4%]6
All ❌✅ (primary)-0.2%[-1.0%, 0.6%]9

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 490.376s -> 490.585s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 390.46 MiB -> 390.48 MiB (0.01%)

@rustbotrustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Aug 2, 2026
@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Looks like it helps, but we need to skip all the checks to regain the original performance. And I guess for Miri this just will be an actual ~5% slowdown...

@bors try
@rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbotrustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 3, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-borsBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@RalfJung
RalfJungforce-pushed the interpret-deref-validity branch from 5023690 to b701093CompareAugust 3, 2026 08:17
@rust-bors

rust-borsBot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 857e16e (857e16ea6e812013b38eea7b5ecbc5162496574b)
Base parent: 65dd30f (65dd30fb9e882a7e8f0be10caca62936db2a98b8)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (857e16e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never rustc-perf
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3%[0.3%, 0.3%]1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-13.1%[-14.2%, -12.2%]6
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.5%, secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.6%[0.9%, 4.3%]2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8%[2.8%, 2.8%]1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.8%[-0.8%, -0.8%]1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6%[-0.9%, -0.4%]15
All ❌✅ (primary)1.5%[-0.8%, 4.3%]3

Cycles

Results (primary 0.6%, secondary 0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.2%[0.5%, 3.1%]6
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7%[0.5%, 3.9%]7
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.5%[-0.6%, -0.5%]3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3%[-4.1%, -0.4%]4
All ❌✅ (primary)0.6%[-0.6%, 3.1%]9

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 491.898s -> 488.826s (-0.62%)
Artifact size: 391.08 MiB -> 390.47 MiB (-0.16%)

@rustbotrustbot removed perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Aug 3, 2026
@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

r? @oli-obk

@RalfJung
RalfJung marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2026 10:10
@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri interpreter

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to the CTFE machinery

cc @oli-obk, @lcnr

miri is developed in its own repository. If the Miri part of this change can be broken out, consider making this change to rust-lang/miri instead. However, if Miri needs adjusting for rustc changes, just ignore this message.

cc @rust-lang/miri

@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 3, 2026
@RalfJung
RalfJungforce-pushed the interpret-deref-validity branch from b701093 to 75505d9CompareAugust 3, 2026 10:11

@oli-obkoli-obk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bors r+

Sad about the early UB errors. Maybe some day we'll just rerun with all checks when the final value has an error?

View changes since this review

@rust-bors

rust-borsBot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 75505d9 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-borsrust-borsBot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 3, 2026
@Kobzol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Marking as rollup=iffy, because this only affects one benchmark, and we have a lot of rollup=never PRs in the queue.

@bors rollup=iffy

rust-borsBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
…uwer
Rollup of 10 perf-sensitive pull requests
Successful merges:
- #157281 (perf: skip irrelevant foreign impls when building the specialization graph)
- #159403 (Next steps for FnDef binder changes (instantiate most FnDef binders))
- #159763 (Optimize crate resolution for large workspace)
- #160033 (Speed up `EverInitializedPlaces`)
- #160268 (perf: store the fulfillment engine inline in ObligationCtxt)
- #160317 (perf: Cache already-checked types in the privacy visitor)
- #160399 (interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed)
- #160451 (Deduplicate target and host filesearch)
- #160453 (Add fast path to `escape_string_symbol`)
- #160454 (Add offload guard flags to typeck to prevent perf regressions)
@rust-bors
rust-borsBot merged commit 015a989 into rust-lang:mainAug 4, 2026
13 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.99.0 milestone Aug 4, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
Rollup merge of #160399 - RalfJung:interpret-deref-validity, r=oli-obk
interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed
Trying to claw back the perf regression from #160012.
We could also, like, skip the entire check in const-eval when we don't care about validity. But the slowdown will also affect Miri so I want to first try what we can do without doing less UB checking.
@RalfJung
RalfJung deleted the interpret-deref-validity branch August 5, 2026 06:28
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Verifying that actual perf results after merge match expected results
@rust-timer build 6e167bd

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

WhySoBad pushed a commit to WhySoBad/miri that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
…uwer
Rollup of 10 perf-sensitive pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#157281 (perf: skip irrelevant foreign impls when building the specialization graph)
- rust-lang/rust#159403 (Next steps for FnDef binder changes (instantiate most FnDef binders))
- rust-lang/rust#159763 (Optimize crate resolution for large workspace)
- rust-lang/rust#160033 (Speed up `EverInitializedPlaces`)
- rust-lang/rust#160268 (perf: store the fulfillment engine inline in ObligationCtxt)
- rust-lang/rust#160317 (perf: Cache already-checked types in the privacy visitor)
- rust-lang/rust#160399 (interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed)
- rust-lang/rust#160451 (Deduplicate target and host filesearch)
- rust-lang/rust#160453 (Add fast path to `escape_string_symbol`)
- rust-lang/rust#160454 (Add offload guard flags to typeck to prevent perf regressions)
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6e167bd): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never rustc-perf
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
--0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3%[0.3%, 0.3%]1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
--0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-12.8%[-13.9%, -11.9%]6
All ❌✅ (primary)--0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary -0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6%[0.5%, 0.8%]7
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.5%[0.4%, 0.7%]5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.3%[-2.3%, -2.3%]1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-6.0%[-6.0%, -6.0%]1
All ❌✅ (primary)0.2%[-2.3%, 0.8%]8

Cycles

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

meanrangecount
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7%[0.4%, 1.3%]4
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.0%[0.4%, 2.9%]6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.8%[-1.6%, -0.5%]7
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.8%[-1.6%, -0.4%]8
All ❌✅ (primary)-0.3%[-1.6%, 1.3%]11

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 489.577s -> 491.533s (0.40%)
Artifact size: 390.24 MiB -> 390.55 MiB (0.08%)

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2026
…uwer
Rollup of 10 perf-sensitive pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#157281 (perf: skip irrelevant foreign impls when building the specialization graph)
- rust-lang/rust#159403 (Next steps for FnDef binder changes (instantiate most FnDef binders))
- rust-lang/rust#159763 (Optimize crate resolution for large workspace)
- rust-lang/rust#160033 (Speed up `EverInitializedPlaces`)
- rust-lang/rust#160268 (perf: store the fulfillment engine inline in ObligationCtxt)
- rust-lang/rust#160317 (perf: Cache already-checked types in the privacy visitor)
- rust-lang/rust#160399 (interpret: skip deref-projection validity checks when they are not needed)
- rust-lang/rust#160451 (Deduplicate target and host filesearch)
- rust-lang/rust#160453 (Add fast path to `escape_string_symbol`)
- rust-lang/rust#160454 (Add offload guard flags to typeck to prevent perf regressions)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@RalfJung@rust-timer@rust-log-analyzer@rustbot@Kobzol@JonathanBrouwer@oli-obk