Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
librustc: Fix a couple of cases in which unboxed closure typechecking - #16637
Merged
Merged
Conversation
code wasn't considering the zero-argument case. Closesrust-lang#16168.
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2024
…r=Veykril fix: Fix proc-macro server not accounting for string delimiters correctly Fixesrust-lang/rust-analyzer#16622 Note that this is a bug a in the proc-macro server, so this won't be fixed until the next subtree sync
flip1995 pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2026
…ust-lang#16637) Encodes the direct relationship between the lengths of `locals` and the returned list, making the code more type-safe changelog: none
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
code wasn't considering the zero-argument case.
Closes#16168.
r? @pnkfelix