Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Match prose with code when discussing Ordering values - #21048
Conversation
Now both the enum values and the prose describing them mention the values in the same order.
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 12, 2015
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @huonw (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 20, 2015
steveklabnik
commented
Jan 20, 2015
@bors: r+ 1c0abc9 |
bors
commented
Jan 20, 2015
🙀 You have the wrong number! Please try again with |
steveklabnik
commented
Jan 20, 2015
steveklabnik
commented
Jan 20, 2015
@bors: r+ 1c-acb9 rollup |
bors
commented
Jan 20, 2015
🙀 You have the wrong number! Please try again with |
steveklabnik
commented
Jan 20, 2015
Now both the enum values and the prose describing them mention the values in the same order.
…incorrect-case Fix hit incorrect_case on no_mangle static items
Now both the enum values and the prose describing them mention the values in the same order.