Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Glossary - #22377
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 15, 2015
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would prefer to be a bit more positive here. I'm not sure exactly what I'd want to write, but something more like "not everyone who comes to Rust has a background in systems programming, nor in computer science, so we've added explanations of domain terms that might be unfamilliar" or something
thiagooak
commented
Feb 15, 2015
Really like the way you wrote it, did small changes "Not every Rustacean has a background in systems programming, nor in computer
|
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 15, 2015
I already mention Rustaceans, so it's fine to add here :) |
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 15, 2015
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 15, 2015
Awesome, thanks! |
kmcallister
commented
Feb 16, 2015
Nice! Is there a wiki page etc. where we can add terms to be glossarized? Also, it'd be great to enhance rustdoc such that we can cross-link possibly unfamiliar terms between the glossary and the text. |
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 16, 2015
Just submit pull requests, though I don't want this to get out of hand. Primarily focusing on CS terms here. |
…bnik @steveklabnik Trying out the Glossary idea. Added the paragraph about 'complicated words' because I think it would be useful to those contributing to the book. Maybe this should not be here
@steveklabnik Trying out the Glossary idea.
Added the paragraph about 'complicated words' because I think it would be useful to those contributing to the book. Maybe this should not be here