Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix private module loophole in the 'private type in public item' check - #23290
Conversation
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
Now with test |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
testing, ignore this triage: I-nominated (1.0 beta) |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated |
1 similar comment
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated (1.0 beta) |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: P-high |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage P-high |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage: I-nominated |
nrc
commented
Mar 11, 2015
triage P-high |
bors
commented
Mar 12, 2015
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #23265) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
nrc
commented
Mar 15, 2015
rebased |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you maybe add a comment about what's going on here? I'm not sure I understand, though I presume this is related to the rules about privacy and impls?
nikomatsakis
commented
Mar 16, 2015
r+ modulo nits |
nrc
commented
Mar 17, 2015
@bors r=nmatsakis 8ef2fb5237ec49ea8d27b868a29743693a3c8605 |
bors
commented
Mar 17, 2015
⌛ Testing commit 8ef2fb5 with merge 885ae98... |
bors
commented
Mar 18, 2015
💔 Test failed - auto-win-32-nopt-t |
nrc
commented
Mar 18, 2015
Closes#22261 r? @nikomatsakis (+ a new test coming soon...)
bors
commented
Mar 18, 2015
⌛ Testing commit 46aa621 with merge f9a7bc5... |
Closes#22261
r? @nikomatsakis
(+ a new test coming soon...)