Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changed the wording of the documentation for the insert method for Vec ... - #24279
Conversation
…c to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording.
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 10, 2015
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. |
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 10, 2015
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 10, 2015
📌 Commit cdce32f has been approved by |
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 10, 2015
@bors: rollup |
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 10, 2015
Thank you! |
libfud
commented
Apr 10, 2015
No problem, more than happy to contribute, even if it's a diff of two lines. |
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 10, 2015
No diff is too small! |
…labnik ...to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording. r? @steveklabnik
…labnik ...to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording. r? @steveklabnik
…labnik ...to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording. r? @steveklabnik
…labnik ...to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording. r? @steveklabnik
...to be less confusing. Since 0 is the smallest number possible for usize, it doesn't make sense to mention it if it's already included, and it should be more clear that the length of the vector is a valid index with the new wording.
r? @steveklabnik