Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
doc: Remove mention of 30 minute intro - #25220
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 8, 2015
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to reduce awkward repetition: "behind Rust" -> "behind the language"
I'd go as far as removing the "you'll be an intermediate Rust developer"
I'm also wondering if "explanation of Rust" excludes Rust concepts, and I wonder if there's a need to mention that the book will also talk syntax (obvious). I'd trim things so that we'd have something like:
If you haven't seen Rust at all yet, the first thing you should read is the introduction. It'll give
you some idea of what Rust is like. The book will explain the language in much greater detail. You should have a good grasp of the fundamental ideas upon completing it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to reduce awkward repetition: "behind Rust" -> "behind the language"
👍
I'd go as far as removing the "you'll be an intermediate Rust developer"
👍
My suggested wording for that paragraph
If this is your first encounter with Rust, the first thing you should read is the introduction. It'll introduce you to the syntax, the primary motivations for creating Rust, and how to set up your own Rust development environment. The rest of the book will explain the language in much greater detail and upon completing it you should have a good grasp of the fundamental ideas behind the Rust programming language.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very nice improvement, but we got to have a pause:
..much greater detail, and upon completing...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@brson, what do you think? I don't feel strongly that this paragraph needs updating, but I don't mind @echochamber 's version either.
steveklabnik
commented
May 12, 2015
@bors: r+ rollup |
bors
commented
May 12, 2015
📌 Commit 51a1e83 has been approved by |
steveklabnik
commented
May 12, 2015
Merging this because I'm okay with not taking the nits. |
No description provided.