trpl: Refactor returning closures section

[critiqjo]

r? @steveklabnik

[rust-highfive]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

[steveklabnik]

I'm a little concerned about this wording, but I can't quite articulate why. Also, why the dashes?

[critiqjo]

I am too... 😄 Please suggest a better wording... The dashes are there so that "create an object and make it static" is taken together when applying "not possible to"..!

[steveklabnik]

Ahh, i see. Yeah, that's not exactly how dashes are usually used, they're used in place of commas or parenthesis, and you wouldn't do that with

so as to, return a static

which is why it seems awkward.

[critiqjo]

How does it look now? (I'll rebase it tomorrow if it seems okay to you)

[critiqjo]

There was a mistake in the last commit, which should be fixed now...

[steveklabnik]

Can we change this to

we cannot directly assign a 'static lifetime to an object. So we'll

After that, this should be good to go 👍

[steveklabnik]

r=me after the nit is fixed, and the commits are squashed

[critiqjo]

@bors r=steveklabnik rollup

I hope rollup is the right thing to do... (been staring at that line for 5 minutes... ok let's click the green button 😅)

[steveklabnik]

@critiqjo bors only listens to those who have access, so don't worry, you can't screw it up.. yet :)

(you did get the right syntax, regardless 👍 )

[steveklabnik]

@bors: r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 09d4dee has been approved by steveklabnik

[critiqjo]

Oh! I misunderstood this:

r=me after ...

So r=me simply meant reply/ping me (since there's no notification for commit changes), huh!

[steveklabnik]

It's a signal to anyone else who _does_ have commit to do exactly what you did, signing off for me.