Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rustdoc: refine cross-crate impl inlining - #33002
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The thread-local isn't needed and consists of mostly empty fields which were just used to move the data into `html::render::CACHE_KEY`.
mitaaforce-pushed
the
rdoc-cross-impls
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 15, 2016 18:57
78f29ce to
9589d72CompareContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After thinking more about this, this probably doesn't matter since an impl in an external crate can't reference a local type or trait (right??).
This changes the current rule that impls within `doc(hidden)` modules aren't inlined, to only inlining impls where the implemented trait and type are reachable in documentation.
ContributorAuthor
Hmm, this probably doesn't yet fix this since this isn't related to inlining. #![crate_type="lib"]pubtraitBar{}#[doc(hidden)]pubmod hidden {pubstructFoo;}// impl shown in `foo::Bar`s implementors section (but without link)implBarfor hidden::Foo{}edit: filed as #33069 |
alexcrichton
commented
Apr 18, 2016
Member
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2016
Collaborator
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2016
rustdoc: refine cross-crate impl inlining This changes the current rule that impls within `doc(hidden)` modules aren't inlined, to only inlining impls where the implemented trait and type are reachable in documentation. fixes#14586fixes#31948 .. and also applies the reachability checking to cross-crate links. fixes#28480 r? @alexcrichton
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2016
Collaborator
This was referenced Apr 19, 2016
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This changes the current rule that impls within
doc(hidden)modules aren't inlined, to only inlining impls where the implemented trait and type are reachable in documentation.fixes#14586
fixes#31948
.. and also applies the reachability checking to cross-crate links.
fixes#28480
r? @alexcrichton