Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
run rustfmt on librustc_typeck/check/method folder - #36736
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Sep 26, 2016
r? @Aatch (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is interesting. Why did the function call take a separate line? Previous formatting looks good to me. @nrc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't seem too bad to me, arguably it is better since using less vertical space and the call all on one line is not too hard to read.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why did rustfmt convert this? These expressions are happily fit on a single line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
rustfmt didnot remove empty line between parameters in a function call @nrc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nrc
commented
Sep 26, 2016
@srinivasreddy could you file rustfmt issues for these things please? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
srinivasreddy
commented
Sep 26, 2016
@nrc Done. Thanks. |
nrc
commented
Sep 26, 2016
Awesome, thank you! |
srinivasreddy
commented
Sep 27, 2016
@nrc Shall we roll-up? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you manually fixup these changes to comments please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you remove the dangling sigil please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These should stay on a line each I think
nrc
commented
Sep 29, 2016
Thanks for doing this! Could you manually fixup the areas where there are issues please? |
srinivasreddy
commented
Sep 29, 2016
@nrc Done. |
srinivasreddy
commented
Sep 30, 2016
r? @nrc |
bors
commented
Oct 1, 2016
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #36885) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
nrc
commented
Oct 2, 2016
looks good, r=me, but needs a rebase |
srinivasreddy
commented
Oct 3, 2016
@nrc Done |
nrc
commented
Oct 3, 2016
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 3, 2016
📌 Commit 9e22f39 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 3, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 9e22f39 with merge 0d77bd2... |
bors
commented
Oct 3, 2016
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt |
nrc
commented
Oct 3, 2016
@srinivasreddy test fail looks real, perhaps a rebasing error? |
@nrc Fixed it |
nrc
commented
Oct 5, 2016
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 5, 2016
📌 Commit 5be0acc has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 5, 2016
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #36814) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
srinivasreddy
commented
Oct 5, 2016
@nrc pls do it again. |
nrc
commented
Oct 5, 2016
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 5, 2016
📌 Commit dcb6b15 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 5, 2016
run rustfmt on librustc_typeck/check/method folder
No description provided.