Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Don't leak the compiler's internal representation of scopes in error messages. - #38552
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 22, 2016
r? @pnkfelix (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
arielb1
commented
Dec 22, 2016
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Dec 22, 2016
📌 Commit 25b1d2c has been approved by |
nikomatsakis
commented
Dec 22, 2016
Marked as beta-accepted: regr in diagnostics, low risk change. |
alexcrichton
commented
Dec 27, 2016
@bors: p=1 (beta nominated) |
bors
commented
Dec 27, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 25b1d2c with merge a1708c2... |
bors
commented
Dec 27, 2016
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
alexcrichton
commented
Dec 27, 2016
via email
@bors: retry
* network failure …On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:50 PM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-travis
<https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/186914248>
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38552 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95NwjMHdvzY_Y-crCeMoQ08eIdYXGks5rMMNTgaJpZM4LUN6w>
.
|
bors
commented
Dec 27, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 25b1d2c with merge 9fc4005... |
bors
commented
Dec 27, 2016
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
eddyb
commented
Dec 27, 2016
How can that even happen? It almost sounds like one line was replaced with the previous line, musl bug? |
eddyb
commented
Dec 30, 2016
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Dec 30, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 25b1d2c with merge abd4aa7... |
bors
commented
Dec 30, 2016
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
nikomatsakis
commented
Dec 30, 2016
looks legitimate |
eddyb
commented
Jan 4, 2017
I think I'll keep changes that are needed solely to make the original patch on master, separate. |
eddyb
commented
Jan 4, 2017
@bors r=arielb1 |
bors
commented
Jan 4, 2017
📌 Commit 987f52f has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 4, 2017
Don't leak the compiler's internal representation of scopes in error messages. Fixes#37884 (actually fixes#27942, which was made worse by #37412) by handling more node types. Ideally we'd turn the unknown node type situations into ICEs and fix them as they show up in errors. But we might want to backport this patch so I was less aggressive.
bors
commented
Jan 4, 2017
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 6, 2017
@eddyb this PR backports cleanly to beta but then results in a build failure. Can you investigate backporting to beta? |
eddyb
commented
Jan 6, 2017
@alexcrichton Do you have the build failure? |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 6, 2017
@eddyb unfortunately no |
Fixes#37884 (actually fixes#27942, which was made worse by #37412) by handling more node types.
Ideally we'd turn the unknown node type situations into ICEs and fix them as they show up in errors.
But we might want to backport this patch so I was less aggressive.