Skip to content

Use ? instead of try! macro in print::pprust - #38692

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
estebank:remove-try-from-pprust
Jan 1, 2017
Merged

Use ? instead of try! macro in print::pprust#38692
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
estebank:remove-try-from-pprust

Conversation

@estebank

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@petrochenkov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 26f0181 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 26f0181 with merge a1f8ab4...

@bors

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@alexcrichton

alexcrichton commented Jan 1, 2017 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 26f0181 with merge 4947ada...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2017
Use `?` instead of `try!` macro in `print::pprust`
@bors

bors commented Jan 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 4947ada to master...

@bors
bors merged commit 26f0181 into rust-lang:masterJan 1, 2017
@estebank
estebank deleted the remove-try-from-pprust branch November 9, 2023 05:27
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@estebank@rust-highfive@petrochenkov@bors@alexcrichton@pnkfelix