Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample - #40144
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 28, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 28, 2017
@bors: r+ rollup thanks! (not sure what's up with travis) |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
📌 Commit 3c5001f has been approved by |
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample r? @steveklabnik BTW it seems that ```Rust let p = Proton {}; ``` compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
frewsxcv
commented
Feb 28, 2017
@bors r- This results in a doctest error: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2166/job/mh1vjrnly4lrqgty |
durka
commented
Feb 28, 2017
Can examples in the book be marked compile-fail? Otherwise that code block will need to be ignored, or the error demonstration line commented out. |
frewsxcv
commented
Feb 28, 2017
I think so: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustdoc/html/markdown.rs#L541-L562 |
frewsxcv
commented
Mar 1, 2017
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Mar 1, 2017
📌 Commit 8f1a0af has been approved by |
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample r? @steveklabnik BTW it seems that ```Rust let p = Proton {}; ``` compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
r? @steveklabnik
BTW it seems that
compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.