Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[beta] Fix link to book repo - #41365
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 18, 2017
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 18, 2017
frewsxcv
commented
Apr 19, 2017
This seems like a good idea to me. Is it okay to r+? Or is there some more process involved since it's a beta merge |
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 19, 2017
Beta stuff gets merged by hand; as sorta "release managers", @brson and or @alexcrichton should make the call and they'll take care of it ❤️ |
alexcrichton
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@bors: r+ p=1 yeah definitely sounds like a good backport! (p=1 as it's a "backport") |
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2017
📌 Commit 1605636 has been approved by |
alexcrichton
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@steveklabnik is this a backport of a PR to master? (just wondering what to tag Also yeah feel free to r+ backports, we still manually bump the beta version number but other than that if a team wants a backport anyone can make a PR and r+ it, no need to wait for me/brson! |
yes, that would have been rust-lang/book#564 (since the book is in its own repo, there isn't a matching PR in this one to tag
Oh right! I forgot we actually use @bors for this now 🎊 |
alexcrichton
commented
Apr 19, 2017
Ok cool no worries, the tags are mostly advisory anyway to track what we need to backport, it's pretty rare to track what we did backport. |
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 8ba21de... |
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
aidanhs
commented
Apr 19, 2017
This failed because of #41396, a retry won't help at the moment. |
alexcrichton
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@bors: retry
|
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 5b85907... |
aidanhs
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@alexcrichton you were optimistic to think that the fuchsia fix would land on the first try ;) This is going to fail again. |
frewsxcv
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Apr 19, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 2a17bb1... |
…lexcrichton [beta] Fix link to book repo This is a backport to beta, to be clear. I don't think we *have* to take this, but opened this PR to see if we should consider it to save six weeks of breakage. Due to extracting the book out into its own repo, this link is broken. This fixes it to point to the right place. This was originally filed as rust-lang/book#633.
frewsxcv
commented
Apr 19, 2017
@bors retry prioritizing beta rollup |
This is a backport to beta, to be clear. I don't think we have to take this, but opened this PR to see if we should consider it to save six weeks of breakage.
Due to extracting the book out into its own repo, this link is broken. This fixes it to point to the right place. This was originally filed as rust-lang/book#633.