Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rustbuild: don't try to install rls if ToolState is not Testing - #45588
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 28, 2017
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
shepmaster
commented
Nov 3, 2017
alexcrichton
commented
Nov 4, 2017
Thanks! Could this use the return value of |
Keruspe
commented
Nov 4, 2017
Sure, I just naively did the same as in the Dist phase. |
The Dist Step is not ran in that case so we would end up trying to install something that we didn't dist. Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
I'm wondering, should we just split the block in two macro parameters, the first one being the dist step we depend on and the second one being the actual edit: looks like |
Keruspe
commented
Nov 6, 2017
@alexcrichton FYI, in case I made it unclear, I amended my initial commit with your suggestion |
alexcrichton
commented
Nov 6, 2017
@bors: r+ Thanks! |
bors
commented
Nov 6, 2017
📌 Commit 784528b has been approved by |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 784528b with merge 31040922a2f540ccc5293596559b4f4ae5eeae8a... |
rustbuild: don't try to install rls if ToolState is not Testing We already do that for the Dist Step so we would end up trying to install something that we didn't dist.
kennytm
commented
Nov 7, 2017
@bors retry — prioritizing rollup |
rustbuild: don't try to install rls if ToolState is not Testing We already do that for the Dist Step so we would end up trying to install something that we didn't dist.
We already do that for the Dist Step so we would end up trying to install something that we didn't dist.