Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[beta] Release notes, dist with time crate, and #48092 - #48146
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 11, 2018
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Feb 11, 2018
Note that #48092 has not yet been approved for beta backport, but it seems like a minimal patch that eddyb has cherry picked cleanly. If we don't make a decision by the time we're going to begin cutting stable this'll probably not go in. |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 11, 2018
@bors: r+ p=100 |
bors
commented
Feb 11, 2018
📌 Commit 3ed7697 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Feb 11, 2018
⌛ Testing commit 3ed7697 with merge 29b633c09f17d329878af0b0c569a2ff7d0e469c... |
bors
commented
Feb 11, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
emilyalbini
commented
Feb 11, 2018
no space left on device -- #48144 |
This should save a lot of space on musl test cases (whose standard library are linked statically).
This isn't a perfect heuristic, but since the amount of run-fail tests is far lower than run-pass tests for now, it should be sufficient to ensure that we don't run into CI limits. This makes it possible to run the test binary manually (e.g., under gdb/lldb) if it failed to attempt to find out why.
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Feb 11, 2018
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Feb 11, 2018
@bors r=alexcrichton |
bors
commented
Feb 11, 2018
📌 Commit 17d0d6a has been approved by |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
⌛ Testing commit 17d0d6a with merge bc4f7624eada6eb7adcdbda87fce95fb1be123e9... |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Feb 12, 2018
@bors retry Looks spurious. |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
⌛ Testing commit 17d0d6a with merge 97374005c34adb40f0e94d3ae014c50423afe08d... |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Feb 12, 2018
@bors retry -- appveyor timed out |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2018
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Backports of