Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass. - #48602
Closed
eddyb wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 28, 2018
Contributor
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
eddyb
commented
Feb 28, 2018
ContributorAuthor
@bors try |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2018
Collaborator
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2018
rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass. **DO NOT MERGE**: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations. As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2018
Collaborator
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
eddyb
commented
Feb 28, 2018
ContributorAuthor
Maybe the specialization bugs weren't fixed, huh. |
eddyb
commented
Feb 28, 2018
ContributorAuthor
@bors try |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2018
Collaborator
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2018
rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass. **DO NOT MERGE**: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations. As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2018
Collaborator
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
nikomatsakis
commented
Mar 2, 2018
Contributor
@eddyb let me know when there is a need for me to review |
bors
commented
Mar 3, 2018
Collaborator
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #48586) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
emilyalbini
commented
Mar 12, 2018
Member
Ping from triage @eddyb! It has been a while since you updated this PR. |
emilyalbini
commented
Mar 20, 2018
Member
@eddyb closing for inactivity, feel free to reopen the PR when you have some spare time to finish this! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DO NOT MERGE: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations.
As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.