Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Various rustfmt and commenting changes - #49969
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 14, 2018
r? @estebank (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
bors
commented
Apr 16, 2018
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49433) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
estebank
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM overall, fix the merge conflict and r=me. That being said, I'd lean towards really small rustfmt PRs to minimize the likelihood of causing merge conflicts for open PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just ran rustfmt on the file. I'm guessing it is avoiding >=100 chars per line...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see this change as an improvement :-/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eh, I could accept either way...
mark-i-m
commented
Apr 16, 2018
@estebank Thanks :) Rebased. |
estebank
commented
Apr 16, 2018
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 16, 2018
📌 Commit d984e4a has been approved by |
bors
commented
Apr 17, 2018
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49882) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
mark-i-m
commented
Apr 17, 2018
@estebank rebased. |
estebank
commented
Apr 17, 2018
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 17, 2018
📌 Commit 787b705 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Apr 18, 2018
Various rustfmt and commenting changes These are factored out of #49320 There aren't actually any changes in functionality, just rustfmt and doccomments.
bors
commented
Apr 18, 2018
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
These are factored out of #49320
There aren't actually any changes in functionality, just rustfmt and doccomments.