Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Make the WF check skip less binders - #50815
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 17, 2018
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
commented
May 17, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Skip the binder in less places during WF check. I thought this might help fixrust-lang#50781, but I couldn't actually observe any effect for this changes. Maybe it's still a worthwhile refactoring since skipping binders is generally a bad thing. There is a (manageble) conflict with rust-lang#50183.
ebbc580 to
30da22bComparerust-highfive
commented
May 17, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
michaelwoerister
commented
May 17, 2018
r? @nikomatsakis for re-assignment |
emilyalbini
commented
May 21, 2018
Ping from triage @nikomatsakis! This PR needs your review. |
leoyvens
commented
May 21, 2018
This isn't actionable right now due to regressions so I've opened #50935 to track this. |
Skip the binder in less places during WF check, meaning we check more higher-ranked things. I thought this might help fix the problem in #50781, but it didn't.
This did regressed test
project-cache-issue-37154with this error:And I couldn't fix the test so that it passes, let alone fix the compiler to allow this. Travis shows more regressions. So even if this is theoretically good, for now it's just an amusing experiment and we should continue ignoring these checks. Maybe in a chalky future with lazy normalization we'll be able to do this. Feel free to close after review.