Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
First step towards u128 instead of Const in PatternKind::Range - #51159
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 29, 2018
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cramertj (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
cramertj
commented
May 29, 2018
r? @oli-obk |
eddyb
commented
May 30, 2018
cc @varkor |
emilyalbini
commented
Jun 4, 2018
Ping from triage @oli-obk! This PR needs your review. |
oli-obk
commented
Jun 4, 2018
varkor
commented
Jun 4, 2018
bors
commented
Jun 29, 2018
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #51884) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
TimNN
commented
Aug 28, 2018
Ping from triage! Wow, after a multi-month process, the blocking PR has been merged 🎉 If I understand correctly, this PR should be unblocked now, however it does require a rebase, @pacman82. |
pacman82
commented
Aug 29, 2018
@TimNN Thanks for the ping; I'll hopefully find the time this weekend. |
pacman82
commented
Sep 4, 2018
oli-obk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just a nit.
Would you also be so kind and squash the commits into a single one?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
BatmanAoD
commented
Sep 11, 2018
Ping from triage, @pacman82; looks like this is pretty close. |
oli-obk
commented
Sep 11, 2018
r=me with the nits addressed. |
eddyb
commented
Sep 11, 2018
@bors r=oli-obk |
bors
commented
Sep 11, 2018
📌 Commit 26c05b1 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Sep 12, 2018
First step towards `u128` instead of `Const` in `PatternKind::Range` This PR accomplishes two things: * It adds `ty::Ty` to `PatternKind::Range`. The extra type information will make it easier to remove it from the `hi` and `lo` members. * It exchanges `Const` for `u128` in `Constructor::ConstantRange`.
bors
commented
Sep 12, 2018
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
This PR accomplishes two things:
ty::TytoPatternKind::Range. The extra type information will make it easier to remove it from thehiandlomembers.Constforu128inConstructor::ConstantRange.