Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Ignore test files on powerpc64* that's already ignored on powerpc - #51237
Ignore test files on powerpc64* that's already ignored on powerpc#51237infinity0 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
#50989 The ignore-checker was made more strict recently so we now need more explicit ones
rust-highfive
commented
May 31, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
shepmaster
commented
Jun 2, 2018
Thanks for the PR! Doing a spot check with It seems this PR is missing a few of those, should it have them? |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 4, 2018
I don't think that any of the changes here should make the CI tests fail. Are you sure this isn't a different problem? Can someone retry? |
shepmaster
commented
Jun 4, 2018
We can retry when the review comments are addressed - no need to waste CI time until then. |
shepmaster
commented
Jun 4, 2018
However, if you read the messages, they are because the locations of error messages have changed in the modified files, so yes, this PR has broken those tests. |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 4, 2018
Sorry, I must be missing something here? All that @infinity0 did was adding some |
shepmaster
commented
Jun 4, 2018
I might have misread, let me investigate more. |
shepmaster
commented
Jun 4, 2018
The same error occurs when I run |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 4, 2018
Hmm, ok. So, I assume this means adding |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 4, 2018
I am trying to understand the problem and just looked at other commits which set certain tests to ignore for mips*, i.e. 54467ae. And I don't anything different to what @infinity0 has done. Has anything changed in this regard? |
infinity0
commented
Jun 5, 2018
I will fix the line numbers tomorrow but I am not sure blanket-ignoring the other files is appropriate, since they didn't cause test failures that I could see. As an aside I'm pretty annoyed that I even have to do this (and then getting told to do extra work on the PR to fix it), the original person who made this change really should be the one fixing it. |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 5, 2018
@infinity0 Fixing the |
glaubitz
commented
Jun 17, 2018
@infinity0 You can close this now, my fix in #51343 was merged. |
infinity0
commented
Jun 17, 2018
Your PR was merged but it only takes care of sparc64 not powerpc64, sounds like this PR is still needed (and the line numbers need fixing up again?) |
infinity0
commented
Jun 17, 2018
I just saw #51392 so closing. |
Fixes#50989.
The ignore-checker was made more strict recently so we now need more explicit ones