Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Stabilize unit tests with non-() return type - #51298
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 2, 2018
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @petrochenkov (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Jun 2, 2018
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 2, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 2, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
should it be |
bors
commented
Jun 3, 2018
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #50338) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 4, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
| // Allows use of the :lifetime macro fragment specifier | ||
| (accepted, macro_lifetime_matcher, "1.27.0", Some(34303), None), | ||
| // Termination trait in tests (RFC 1937) | ||
| (accepted, termination_trait_test, "1.27.0", Some(48854), Some(Edition::Edition2018)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not really clear on why the Edition::Edition2018 flag was set here, actually. I would imagine that this feature would just be generally available on any edition. Can we just change to None?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should it be None instead? feels odd 😛
Yeah, I think it should. I don't think that flag actually has meaning for accepted feature gates.
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 5, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 5, 2018
Your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem. Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 6, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Jun 6, 2018
@bors r=nikomatsakis |
bors
commented
Jun 6, 2018
@Dylan-DPC: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jun 6, 2018
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Jun 6, 2018
📌 Commit 8ecbd35 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jun 7, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 7, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
1 similar comment
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 7, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
kennytm
commented
Jun 7, 2018
bors
commented
Jun 8, 2018
⌛ Testing commit 8ecbd35 with merge 2396a06e5a6b723307f7f7c750b7636566369b6a... |
bors
commented
Jun 8, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 8, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 8, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
kennytm
commented
Jun 8, 2018
@bors retry 3 hour timeout. |
…t, r=nikomatsakis Stabilize unit tests with non-`()` return type References rust-lang#48854
bors
commented
Jun 8, 2018
⌛ Testing commit 8ecbd35 with merge 52bb230d937274b84074266b71438b72b46bffbb... |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Jun 8, 2018
@bors retry -- rolled up |
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #50143 (Add deprecation lint for duplicated `macro_export`s) - #51099 (Fix Issue 38777) - #51276 (Dedup auto traits in trait objects.) - #51298 (Stabilize unit tests with non-`()` return type) - #51360 (Suggest parentheses when a struct literal needs them) - #51391 (Use spans pointing at the inside of a rustdoc attribute) - #51394 (Use scope tree depths to speed up `nearest_common_ancestor`.) - #51396 (Make the size of Option<NonZero*> a documented guarantee.) - #51401 (Warn on `repr` without hints) - #51412 (Avoid useless Vec clones in pending_obligations().) - #51427 (compiletest: autoremove duplicate .nll.* files (#51204)) - #51436 (Do not require stage 2 compiler for rustdoc) - #51437 (rustbuild: generate full list of dependencies for metadata) Failed merges:
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 8, 2018
Your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem. Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
References #48854