Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributing.md: remove spurious verb - #5186
Closed
ben0x539 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2013
I'm wary of editing the offical-looking things like the contribution policy, but I hope fixing typos/the sentence structure is okay.
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2020
Rename `FunctionRetTy` to `FnRetTy` Rustup to rust-lang#69179 changelog: none
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2020
…shearth,llogiq,flip1995 I like to move it, move it GHA now runs in the background for 6 days (rust-lang#5088) Since then ~~15~~ 19 PRs were successfully merged and Travis+Appveyor agreed on the status in every case. ([GitHub PR search query](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+merged%3A%3E%3D2020-02-12T15%3A42%3A00+sort%3Aupdated-desc+NOT+%5Bgh-pages%5D+in%3Atitle)) Some PRs were: - rust-lang#5163 - rust-lang#5170 - rust-lang#5168 - rust-lang#5173 - rust-lang#5171 - rust-lang#5156 - rust-lang#4809 - rust-lang#5177 - rust-lang#5182 - rust-lang#5183 - rust-lang#5184 - rust-lang#5185 - rust-lang#5186 - rust-lang#5181 - rust-lang#5189 Bug with GHA: - When a rustc PR gets merged between the `integration_build` and the `integration` job, the `integration` job will fail. This happened once in rust-lang#5162, but not in the past 6 days. Even if it would happen every 4th PR we would save time, since splitting up the integration build and tests saves 5-7 minutes per run and a complete run takes 15-17 minutes - Sometimes the MacOS build takes up to an hour to download the master toolchain. Until now, this happend 2 or 3 times and can be resolved by a `@bors r3try`+canceling the previous run (restarting single jobs is not supported yet) ## Before merging this, rust-lang/rust-central-station#578 has to get merged This PR is for starting the discussion and to get consensus (@rust-lang/clippy) on a final move to GHA. If we're ready, I'll contact Pietro, to finalize the move. changelog: Clippy completely runs on GHA now 🎉 --- BTW: The deployment already runs on GHA, instead of Travis.
calebcartwright added a commit
to calebcartwright/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
…022-01-23 sync subtree
U007D pushed a commit
to U007D/rust-mos
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2026
…t-lang#5186 5089: Disable auto-complete on comments r=matklad a=BGluth Resolvesrust-lang#4907 by disabling any auto-completion on comments. As flodiebold [pointed out](rust-lang/rust-analyzer#4907 (comment)), in the future we may want to support some form of auto-completion within doc comments, but for now it was suggested to just disable auto-completion on them entirely. The implementation involves adding a new field `is_comment` to `CompletionContext` and checking if the immediate token we auto-completed on is a comment. I couldn't see a case where we need to check any of the ancestors, but let me know if this is not sufficient. I also wasn't sure if it was necessary to add a new field to this struct, but I decided it's probably the best option if we want to potentially do auto-completion on doc comments in the future. Finally, the three tests I added should I think ideally not filter results by `CompletionKind::Keyword`, but if I want to get unfiltered results, I need access to a non-public function [get_all_completion_items](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/9a4d02faf9c47f401b8756c3f7fcab2198f5f9cd/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/test_utils.rs#L32-L39) which I don't know if I should make public just for this. 5161: SSR: Add initial support for placeholder constraints r=matklad a=davidlattimore 5184: Always install required nightly extension if current one is not nightly r=matklad a=Veetaha This is weird, but having switched back to stable by uninstalling the extension appears that vscode doesn't destroy the `PersistentState` and thus changing to `nightly` channel doesn't work because the last check for nightly extension was less than 1 hour ago. The simple solution is to skip this check if we know that the current extension version is not nightly. 5185: Force showing extension activation error pop-up notification r=matklad a=Veetaha Fixesrust-lang/rust-analyzer#5091 5186: fix: correct pd/ppd/tfn/tmod completion doc r=matklad a=fannheyward https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/a33eefa3b26000b3018e6bb873f18dbe15ab4ab7/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_snippet.rs#L23-L24 Co-authored-by: BGluth <gluthb@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com> Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Heyward Fann <fannheyward@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm wary of editing the offical-looking things like the contribution policy, but I hope fixing typos/the sentence structure is okay.