Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable - #53418
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Aug 16, 2018
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @estebank (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
estebank
commented
Aug 17, 2018
bors
commented
Aug 17, 2018
📌 Commit e665715 has been approved by |
ekse
commented
Aug 17, 2018
No worries! I hope you're having a great time at the conference. |
bors
commented
Aug 18, 2018
Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable I think the following suggestions should be safe to mark as `MachineApplicable`. r? @estebank
bors
commented
Aug 18, 2018
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
rust-highfive
commented
Aug 18, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
estebank
commented
Aug 18, 2018
@bors retry seems spurious to me. |
…stebank Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable I think the following suggestions should be safe to mark as `MachineApplicable`. r? @estebank
…stebank Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable I think the following suggestions should be safe to mark as `MachineApplicable`. r? @estebank
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #53418 (Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable) - #53431 (Moved some feature gate ui tests to correct location) - #53442 (Update version of rls-data used with save-analysis) - #53504 (Set applicability for more suggestions.) - #53541 (Fix missing impl trait display as ret type) - #53544 (Point at the trait argument when using unboxed closure) - #53558 (Normalize source line and column numbers.) - #53562 (Lament the invincibility of the Turbofish) - #53574 (Suggest direct raw-pointer dereference) - #53585 (Remove super old comment on function that parses items) Failed merges: - #53472 (Use FxHash{Map,Set} instead of the default Hash{Map,Set} everywhere in rustc.) - #53563 (use String::new() instead of String::from(""), "".to_string(), "".to_owned() or "".into()) r? @ghost
I think the following suggestions should be safe to mark as
MachineApplicable.r? @estebank