Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums - #55253
Merged
Conversation
Felix S. Klock II pointed out that this suggestion (introduced in pull-request rust-lang#43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong), even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most notably, `Some`). Particularly tender-hearted code-historians may be inclined to show mercy towards the author of rust-lang#43178 on the grounds that it's somewhat confusing that struct field definitions are given in a type called `ty::VariantDef`. Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.) This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be easier to read in ignore-whitespace mode (`-w`). Resolvesrust-lang#55250.
pnkfelix
commented
Oct 22, 2018
Contributor
@bors r+ rollup |
zackmdavis
commented
Oct 23, 2018
ContributorAuthor
Webhook may not have fired due to the recent troubles? @bors r=pnkfelix rollup |
bors
commented
Oct 23, 2018
Collaborator
📌 Commit b0d3d3b has been approved by |
emilyalbini added a commit
to emilyalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2018
only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums This suggestion (introduced in pull-request rust-lang#43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong), even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most notably, `Some`). Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.) This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be easier to read in [ignore-whitespace mode](rust-lang@b0d3d3b9?w=1). Resolvesrust-lang#55250. r? @pnkfelix
kennytm added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2018
only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums This suggestion (introduced in pull-request rust-lang#43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong), even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most notably, `Some`). Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.) This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be easier to read in [ignore-whitespace mode](rust-lang@b0d3d3b9?w=1). Resolvesrust-lang#55250. r? @pnkfelix
emilyalbini added a commit
to emilyalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2018
only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums This suggestion (introduced in pull-request rust-lang#43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong), even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most notably, `Some`). Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.) This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be easier to read in [ignore-whitespace mode](rust-lang@b0d3d3b9?w=1). Resolvesrust-lang#55250. r? @pnkfelix
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2018
Rollup of 22 pull requests Successful merges: - #53507 (Add doc for impl From for Waker) - #53931 (Gradually expanding libstd's keyword documentation) - #54965 (update tcp stream documentation) - #54977 (Accept `Option<Box<$t:ty>>` in macro argument) - #55138 (in which unused-parens suggestions heed what the user actually wrote) - #55173 (Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type) - #55200 (Documents `From` implementations for `Stdio`) - #55245 (submodules: update clippy from 5afdf8b to b1d0343) - #55247 (Clarified code example in char primitive doc) - #55251 (Fix a typo in the documentation of RangeInclusive) - #55253 (only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums) - #55254 (Correct trailing ellipsis in name_from_pat) - #55269 (fix typos in various places) - #55282 (Remove redundant clone) - #55285 (Do some copy editing on the release notes) - #55291 (Update stdsimd submodule) - #55296 (Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs) - #55306 (Regression test for #54478.) - #55328 (Fix doc for new copysign functions) - #55340 (Operands no longer appear in places) - #55345 (Remove is_null) - #55348 (Update RELEASES.md after destabilization of non_modrs_mods) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This suggestion (introduced in pull-request #43178 / eac7410) was being issued for one-field-struct expected types (in which case it is misleading and outright wrong), even though it was only intended for one-field enum-variants (most notably,
Some).Add a conditional to adhere to the original intent. (It would be possible to generalize to structs, but not obviously net desirable.) This adds a level of indentation, so the diff here is going to be
easier to read in ignore-whitespace mode.
Resolves#55250.
r? @pnkfelix