Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove the grammar. - #55545
Conversation
This is completely vestigial, and we have a grammar WG whose job it is to handle the grammar.
Centril
commented
Oct 31, 2018
@qmx is WG-grammar lead. I use |
Centril
commented
Oct 31, 2018
Clarification: I'd like us to remove this eventually, but I think it's too soon. |
eddyb
commented
Oct 31, 2018
cc @rust-lang/wg-grammar |
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 31, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
qmx
commented
Oct 31, 2018
Added rust-lang/wg-grammar#9 to track this work lest we forget. Hopefully we'll be able to get to this soon! |
TimNN
commented
Nov 13, 2018
Ping from triage @qmx / @rust-lang/wg-grammar: Do I understand correctly, that this PR shouldn't be merged for now? |
qmx
commented
Nov 13, 2018
@TimNN yes, that is correct - feel free to close this PR and we'll get back to it later |
Remove legacy grammar Revival of rust-lang#50835 & rust-lang#55545 On the #wg-grammar discord there was agreement that enough progress has been made to be able to remove the legacy grammar. r? @Centril@qmx cc @rust-lang/wg-grammar
Remove legacy grammar Revival of rust-lang#50835 & rust-lang#55545 On the #wg-grammar discord there was agreement that enough progress has been made to be able to remove the legacy grammar. r? @Centril@qmx cc @rust-lang/wg-grammar
This is completely vestigial, and we have a grammar WG whose job it is to handle the grammar.
This is a revival of #50835; if accepted, I'll have to update the reference as well.
r? @rust-lang/lang i think? I forget who is the lead of wg-grammar. @nikomatsakis ?