Implement chalk unification routines by scalexm · Pull Request #56214 · rust-lang/rust

scalexm · 2018-11-25T15:48:29Z

ResolventOps and AggregateOps are mostly straightforwardly translated from chalk. I had caught a few bugs already in my chalk branch and backported fixes to this branch, but there may be other ones left. EDIT: I hope there are none left now :)

Fixes#54935.

r? @nikomatsakis

nikomatsakis

Everything seems fine except for the question of unifying two existential inference variables...

nikomatsakis · 2018-11-29T18:41:10Z

I'm not 100% sure what this means. For example, we might have for<'a> fn(&'a u32), right? That's a bound variable?

no "bound type vars", so e.g. no for<T> ...

I replaced with "no bound types at all" (I dropped "vars")

nikomatsakis · 2018-11-29T18:55:00Z

interesting. I guess that's ok. feels creepy to go into the "other" relate code but...

I was thinking the same, but basically super_combine_tys just unifies int/float vars and calls super_relate_tys so...

nikomatsakis · 2018-11-29T19:10:03Z

This surprises me. I don't think it is correct. In particular, unifying two unbound existential variables is infallible: it results in a unified variable whose universe is the minimum of the two universes, no? Am I misreading this?

yes that's definitely a mistake

`make_solution` does not return any guidance for now

nikomatsakis · 2018-11-29T21:22:39Z

@bors r+

bors · 2018-11-29T21:22:41Z

📌 Commit 1fce415 has been approved by nikomatsakis

scalexm · 2018-11-29T21:43:50Z

@bors p=1
(I'm setting a priority because I'd like this to land quickly, as I'll be less available starting in December, if anybody has an issue with that please do contact me!)

bors · 2018-11-30T04:47:01Z

⌛ Testing commit 1fce415 with merge 3dbe6bae99ecd6a2e6dd7a84ac603332d8ed678b...

bors · 2018-11-30T06:44:09Z

💔 Test failed - status-travis

rust-highfive · 2018-11-30T06:44:11Z

The job dist-x86_64-linux-alt of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

[01:50:08] Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2m 59s
[01:50:08] Installing /cargo/bin/cargo-vendor
[01:50:08] warning: be sure to add `/cargo/bin` to your PATH to be able to run the installed binaries
[01:50:12] Downloading openssl-src v111.0.1+1.1.1
[01:50:52] warning: spurious network error (2 tries remaining): failed to download from `https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/openssl-src/111.0.1+1.1.1/download`
[01:51:32] warning: spurious network error (1 tries remaining): failed to download from `https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/openssl-src/111.0.1+1.1.1/download`
[01:52:18] Downloading openssl-src v111.0.1+1.1.1
[01:52:58] warning: spurious network error (2 tries remaining): failed to download from `https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/openssl-src/111.0.1+1.1.1/download`
[01:53:38] warning: spurious network error (1 tries remaining): failed to download from `https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/openssl-src/111.0.1+1.1.1/download`
[01:54:18] [01:54:18] Caused by:
[01:54:18] failed to fetch package
[01:54:18] [01:54:18] [01:54:18] Caused by:
[01:54:18] unable to get packages from source
[01:54:18] [01:54:18] Caused by:
[01:54:18] failed to download from `https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/openssl-src/111.0.1+1.1.1/download`
[01:54:18] Caused by:
[01:54:18] [28] Timeout was reached
[01:54:18] [01:54:18] ---
travis_time:end:06dbf69a:start=1543560158822313955,finish=1543560158832006520,duration=9692565
travis_fold:end:after_failure.3
travis_fold:start:after_failure.4
travis_time:start:00da24a3
$ ln -s . checkout && for CORE in obj/cores/core.*; do EXE=$(echo $CORE | sed 's|obj/cores/core\.[0-9]*\.!checkout!\(.*\)|\1|;y|!|/|'); if [ -f "$EXE" ]; then printf travis_fold":start:crashlog\n\033[31;1m%s\033[0m\n" "$CORE"; gdb --batch -q -c "$CORE" "$EXE" -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'dir src/' -iex 'set sysroot .' -ex bt -ex q; echo travis_fold":"end:crashlog; fi; done || true
travis_fold:end:after_failure.4
travis_fold:start:after_failure.5
travis_time:start:0195f6a4
travis_time:start:0195f6a4
$ cat ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers || true
cat: ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers: No such file or directory
travis_fold:end:after_failure.5
travis_fold:start:after_failure.6
travis_time:start:05b8591e
$ dmesg | grep -i kill

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

scalexm · 2018-11-30T08:44:09Z

@bors retry

bors · 2018-11-30T09:39:51Z

⌛ Testing commit 1fce415 with merge 814805b8941fbf8ea2258a6b1c28c57a87fa00e9...

bors · 2018-11-30T11:50:06Z

💔 Test failed - status-travis

scalexm · 2018-11-30T12:44:50Z

@bors retry
I see a similar error in #55767 (comment)

bors · 2018-11-30T13:31:39Z

⌛ Testing commit 1fce415 with merge af2a8b786c99b3ec5e117c751ee95209c1334ef7...

bors · 2018-11-30T15:45:04Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

scalexm · 2018-11-30T15:48:33Z

@bors retry

#52590

---- net::tcp::tests::connect_timeout_unbound stdout ----
28706thread 'net::tcp::tests::connect_timeout_unbound' panicked at 'called Result::unwrap_err() on an Ok value: TcpStream { addr: V4(127.0.0.1:3856), peer: V4(127.0.0.1:3856), socket: 800 }', src\libcore\result.rs:1009:5

It seems like this PR will never land!

bors · 2018-11-30T16:02:33Z

⌛ Testing commit 1fce415 with merge 58d5ad432943e55fd60c1c548be00a5c625e70f9...

bors · 2018-11-30T16:06:38Z

⌛ Testing commit 1fce415 with merge 8f1e94578a06f2c896a13d760c04904f70f881e3...

scalexm · 2018-11-30T16:15:28Z

@bors p=0
In case it fails again, I’m giving back the priority to other PRs.

bors · 2018-11-30T17:47:21Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

scalexm · 2018-11-30T17:56:24Z

Same failure as in
#55011 (comment)

kennytm · 2018-11-30T18:18:33Z

@bors retry

Implement chalk unification routines `ResolventOps` and `AggregateOps` are mostly straightforwardly translated from chalk. I had caught a few bugs already in my `chalk` branch and backported fixes to this branch, but there may be other ones left. EDIT: I hope there are none left now :) Fixesrust-lang#54935.

Rollup of 19 pull requests Successful merges: - #55011 (Add libstd Cargo feature "panic_immediate_abort") - #55821 (Use sort_by_cached_key when the key function is not trivial/free) - #56014 (add test for issue #21335) - #56131 (Assorted tweaks) - #56214 (Implement chalk unification routines) - #56216 (Add TryFrom<&[T]> for [T; $N] where T: Copy) - #56268 (Reuse the `P` in `InvocationCollector::fold_{,opt_}expr`.) - #56324 (Use raw_entry for more efficient interning) - #56336 (Clean up and streamline the pretty-printer) - #56337 (Fix const_fn ICE with non-const function pointer) - #56339 (Remove not used option) - #56341 (Rename conversion util; remove duplicate util in librustc_codegen_llvm.) - #56349 (rustc 1.30.0's linker flavor inference is a non-backwards compat change to -Clinker) - #56355 (Add inline attributes and add unit to CommonTypes) - #56360 (Optimize local linkchecker program) - #56364 (Fix panic with outlives in existential type) - #56365 (Stabilize self_struct_ctor feature.) - #56367 (Moved some feature gate tests to correct location) - #56373 (Update books)

rust-highfive assigned nikomatsakis Nov 25, 2018

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 25, 2018

scalexm force-pushed the unification branch from 997b0a9 to 58f78e5Compare November 28, 2018 15:31

nikomatsakis requested changes Nov 29, 2018
View reviewed changes

This comment has been minimized.
Sign in to view

scalexm force-pushed the unification branch from 1d9b04c to fc12ccbCompare November 29, 2018 20:29

This comment has been minimized.
Sign in to view

scalexm added 5 commits November 29, 2018 21:57

Handle inference variables in nll_relate and use it for chalk
3b2cfc5

Implement ResolventOps
0169dc3

Implement AggregateOps
b2b82f7
`make_solution` does not return any guidance for now

Fix doc comments
c805e81

Correctly generalize inference variables in nll_relate
1fce415

scalexm force-pushed the unification branch from fc12ccb to 1fce415Compare November 29, 2018 20:57

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 30, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 30, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 30, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 30, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 30, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 30, 2018

kennytm mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2018
Rollup of 19 pull requests #56381
Merged

scalexm mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2018
Implement the new-style trait solver #56384
Merged

bors merged commit 1fce415 into rust-lang:masterNov 30, 2018

scalexm deleted the unification branch February 4, 2019 14:30

kennytm mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2019
Spurious SIGILL (signal 4) when linking with cc on macOS during doctest #58209
Closed

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

scalexm commented Nov 25, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nikomatsakisNov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

scalexmNov 29, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

scalexmNov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nikomatsakisNov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

scalexmNov 29, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nikomatsakisNov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

scalexmNov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

nikomatsakis commented Nov 29, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 29, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 29, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

rust-highfive commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

kennytm commented Nov 30, 2018

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

scalexm commented Nov 25, 2018•
edited
Loading

scalexmNov 29, 2018•
edited
Loading

scalexmNov 29, 2018•
edited
Loading

scalexm commented Nov 29, 2018•
edited
Loading

scalexm commented Nov 30, 2018•
edited
Loading